What does it mean to say a license is "compatible with the GPL?" It means [...] you can combine code released under the other license with code released under the GNU GPL in one larger program. Read the full answer: https://u.fsf.org/3u6
That's all well and good but I will feel zero sympathy when anticheat screws them over. Not if, when. They're free to do as they please but they're not doing themselves any favors.
No I wouldn't. If I were to install an alternate OS on my Android device I would try to use something like PostmarketOS or Mobian. If those didn't work my next options would be Ubuntu Touch, Droidian, GrapheneOS, DivestOS, or /e/ OS. ChromeOS simply doesn't interest me. I'm trying to move away from Google not closer.
N79 band private 5G + Liberty Phone = holistic security for gov/enterprise. Made in USA, custom options available. #5G #Security #Purism
https://puri.sm/posts/private-cellular-networking-and-secure-client-devices/
I think it doesn't effect me at all since I refuse to buy games that use Anticheat or other invasive DRM.
It's ✨ Asset Wednesday ✨! I've completely remade my older Brick Pack (2015), each of the existing bricks has been redrawn and new ones have been added.
Download (free, for everyone!)
https://kenney.nl/assets/brick-pack
We’re (again) seeing the limitation of the vague “open” label, especially when applied to code and data without which it cannot function:
https://scholar.social/@dingemansemark/112838089680780055
The four freedoms and the notion of “Complete Corresponding Source” remain a clear and unambiguous framework to determine whether software provides users with freedom and autonomy.
I have been gaming since 1992 and building PCs since 2003. I enjoy Linux, supporting FOSS projects and am a tinfoil hat connoisseur.