Show newer

@freemo @p @cowanon Well, yes, but actually no.

It would probably be better to give the IP to the authorities if he's actually threatening to kill people, instead of posting it online.

@freemo @realcaseyrollins @cowanon

> I suggested lawyers might get involed against MKULTRA should he exhibit violence **on** the QOTO server.

You said you would sue him and release his IP addresses and email address if he tried to sign up. It's right there.

I forgot the part where you said you took legal action against QOTO users.

:terrycame:
coom.png

@p

I never remarked about having a gun outside of a private message between you and the other moderators in private.

I did respond to him threatening my life with a "ok here is my address come do it".. **after** he threatened my life.. your point?

@cowanon @realcaseyrollins

@freemo @realcaseyrollins @cowanon

> If X, I will call my lawyer

> Hey, X occurred

> In no way did I suggest I was getting the lawyer involved yet.
coom.png
@freemo @realcaseyrollins @cowanon

> As for the AR-15 remark, again this was done in a private DM and in no way directed at the user threatening me.

help :terrycame: i'm :icame: gonna :animecame: coom

Since you asked for it, here we go. I don't know which users you sued, I've never heard of a lawyer that is on-call "24/7", but here's some obvious internet jokes from him and you going "COME SAY THAT TO MY FACE MICROPENIS" and that's not even the entire extent of it but whatever, and I'm not gonna do anything past a halfassed grep, I am making shit at the moment and I have wasted way more time than I want to on your nonsense here.

Here's a link to the public thread and I'll just wait for FSE to crash for all the repeated attempts to load that fucker: https://freespeechextremist.com/notice/9tHuU6SK3aitzMyfBI

PLEASE DON'T SUE ME

HEY URRBODY, BE CAREFUL ON QOTO HE WILL SUE YOUR ASS

Fuck's sake, this is tedious.
coom.png

@khird

Interesting. I did not know it would actively prune the replies like that when explicitly viewing them. I dont like that...

@realcaseyrollins

@freemo @realcaseyrollins

In the sense that if you visit a post from within QOTO, say, spinster.xyz/@TatsuyaIshida/po you only see one reply (even if following the post author). But if you go to the Spinster site, there are more - it's just that any branch of the tree of replies is pruned where the author is a Spinster user you're *not* following.

@khird

cut off in what sense? As far as I know you should be able to still see replies you just wont get notified about replies if the reply is from a user on a silenced server.

There is a solution in the works (I suggested it upstream) to better handle muting in a way that users could override it at a server level. I need to check in to see how thats coming along.

@realcaseyrollins

@freemo @realcaseyrollins My main dissatisfaction with it is that I can (1) follow a user on such a site, (2) click on a post of his, and even after these two active, affirmative-consent things I have done, any reply-threads are cut off once another user I haven't followed comments (i.e. that comment and any children are suppressed). A QOTO user really can't be part of the conversation with even a silence in effect.

Show older