Show newer

@Snow @Lux@stereophonic.space Oh okay I thought you meant for users not instances

Yeah that sounds good to me

Potentially NSFW 

gab.com/Kranko I was gonna toot something but I find #Bloat to be banned and whatnot

@Snow @mewmew I like the sentiment, but disagree with the suggestion. I'm a HUGE fan of open dialogue; I never block anymore, only mute. (You also don't lose followers that way haha)

Also I strongly disagree with making some sort of "bad actor" registry. That's the biggest form of . This is the Fedi, not the . (My biggest worry with this aside with cancel culture is, as is the case with the , abuse.)

The way to have solidarity is to have a common enemy. So let's make our enemy proprietary social networks, then we'll all be friends.

I feel like the only reason I still think I'm edgy is cuz I'm a and so are most (all?) of my friends

Like I'm one of the least edgy people on the fedi tbh

Check out this interesting video: Far Cry 6: World Premiere Trailer | Ubisoft [NA] youtube.com/watch?v=BLt2pilKHz

It would aim to be an ideologically neutral anti harassment free speech instance with decentralized and politically balanced moderation, limiting growth to make sure that high quality moderation can be performed and the users are looked after

Show thread

When I start an instance I wonder if people will pre-judge what it'll be like because of who I am and my opinions

re: nsfw 

@sev @ultem @Dan_S Wait what was the internal conflict btw? Just admins fighting?

@chaekyung @realcaseyrollins Hmm. I'm thinking a Free Speech Network with a logo sites can display and code of conduct which protects free speech.

RT @1978Dome
@MrJeremyTurner @lame2_king @membrane55 @DougTenNapel @gragnorr

Show older