ERROR 301 (@realcaseyrollins@pleasehug.me) @realcaseyrollins@gameliberty.club

My main account is @markov .

Why designers should stop obsessing over trends and aim for ‘timeless design’ - Did you know we have an online conference about product design coming up? SPRINT will cover how desi... more: https://thenextweb.com/syndication/2020/05/13/why-designers-should-stop-obsessing-over-trends-and-aim-for-timeless-design/ #syndication #design&dev #tech

Wannabe influencers are being trained to film a believable YouTube apology video https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/13/21256087/james-charles-youtube-instant-influencer-apology-video-drama-controversy #TheVerge #verge #news #rss

Sony says ‘wait for PS5 sales’ before comparing it to Microsoft’s Xbox marketing https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/13/21257068/sony-ps5-sales-xbox-series-x-comparison-next-gen-promotion #TheVerge #verge #news #rss

@freemo @realcaseyrollins

> This all seems rather clueless of what was said and just based on your own assumptions...

I don't know, I see you jumping in with stuff that wasn't under discussion.

> Hays code would be a prime example of this.

That was not a law and it was not a standard created by a company for its own use, it was an industry-wide standard and it has not been "revoked", merely revised, replaced, etc. (Posters advertising a film still may not have a gun pointing directly at the camera, for instance.)

> You also seem to assume that I am somehow ok with censorship laws on the notion that we can repeal them later

No, and given that the paragraph following looks like a lengthy rebuttal of arguments I haven't made (please reread what I wrote if you are confused), I have nothing to say about it.

I'm not interested in trying to reform it, I don't know why you're focusing on arguing that I'm dumb and wrong rather than trying to make your case, and I don't care. I don't wanna engage in anything like this. If you have a course of action to propose, propose it. Making vague references to what you think is the correct thing to do and spending all your time REEEEing that I don't understand anything is fine, you're free to do that, but I am not going to waste time that I could be spending on building the things that I think need to be built.

So the TL;DR of that: you are convinced that you know de way, propose de way. If "de way" cannot be defined in terms other than "YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND ANYTHING", then I don't think you have a proposal and you just wanna have a slap-fight, and I don't care.

Check out this interesting video: My wife dreamed I cheated on her...now she wants an apology! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB-fTmgOJh8

Japanese invasion of Korea (1910)(colorised)

Check out this interesting video: Marvel BLASTED For Dropping Deadpool 3! Disney COMMITS To Woke Trash https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSgzbWB2K5I

Check out this interesting video: Building the ULTIMATE streaming TV bundle on ANY budget | Cord Cutting Guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvEsDeWkris

Check out this interesting video: TAKING ON FAUCI: Senator Rand Paul SLAMS Dr. Fauci | MUST SEE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFhkAcYqe0M

Check out this interesting video: Crazy Prediction at a baseball game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjBfsCWgTv8

Check out this interesting video: Celebrities emerge from quarantine! Exclusive photos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJzl912yaMg

@nekojanai
cdf2762e0e28434ef4b995f325d83fe…

@p

This all seems rather clueless of what was said and just based on your own assumptions...

> Unintentional censorship was not being discussed.

You're right it wasnt, I didnt mention anything about the censorship being unintentional. I'm talking about laws or practices that were very intentionally designed to create censorship that were later revoked.

Hays code would be a prime example of this. It was intentionally designed as a tool of censorship, later revoked. There are countless other examples.

You also seem to assume that I am somehow ok with censorship laws on the notion that we can repeal them later, again a faulty assumption. I'm all for someone opposing a censorship law before it gets passed, obviously this is more efficient than trying to correct it after the fact. but such absolutist thinking, as you tend to engage in, isnt particularly helpful in a world where we are already battling with censorship in many countries. Having insight into how and why past censorship has been abolished is crucial to fixing things. However if we were to take what you said at face value then it would be hopeless, despite history being against you in that regard (in many ways the USA is less censored today than it was in the past).

@realcaseyrollins

I take back anything I’ve ever said about Candace that was anything less than unqualified praise

Whew