Show newer

#noagenda 1247
@Johncdvorak: [Governor Inslee is] the most fascist of all the governors in the entire country!
@adam: You're calling him a fascist, why?
J: He's a fascist.
A: You just sound like Antifa, tell me what he did that's fascist.
J: I am, I'm like Antifa today!

@realcaseyrollins @freemo They could print that story on the back of the box/bottle. A lot of products have this kind of "founder" story printed on the back.

4,056,538 accounts
+36 in the last hour
+1,081 in the last day
+6,723 in the last week

@freemo Haha I would change her clothes a bit to make them a bit more modern...then perhaps change the logo to give her some gray hair? That's all I can think of atm

@Meeper
Yes, to put it politely, when it comes to #digitalFreedom, #Australia is fu$ked.

All our browsing history for two years is stored, including the base stations you connect to, on your journeys etc.

Thankfully the #clearnet is dying, and #Tor and #i2p are taking over.

@realcaseyrollins @verge

I’m convinced Igel is a woman. Think about it, have you ever seen Igel and a woman in the same room together? I think not!

@lain Ahh I see, this makes it more clear to me how it works on the backend. As I understand it, there's still no concept of "rooms", just "messages" and "devices".

Here's a basic mockup of a way I could imagine. From the user's standpoint it still works like one chat, but it has a placeholder where encrypted messages are. This is an example of chatting between my laptop and your phone, where messages between our other devices are hidden.
@alex AP-wise, each user would have a collection of devices. When you send an encrypted ChatMessage, you don't address it to the user, you address it directly to one of their devices, which are AP actors too. This makes federation straightforward. How to make all this obvious on the frontend is the bigger problem, I think.
@alex It's not like this happening tomorrow, so I'd say getting the basic chat correct is the first step anyway. But it's good to keep these things in mind.
@lain Finally got a chance to read this, and I think your conclusion about device->device encryption sounds like a great idea. Obviously we want to have our cake and eat it too (and a system like Matrix makes us believe we're doing that) but it's indeed better to expose how the system actually works to users. That seems like good design.

One question not yet answered is how this will work with the existing ChatMessages system. There's currently one chat for each user. Would E2EE require us to have a separate chat for each device?

I imagine this could be consolidated on the frontend for a streamlined UI, but I'm curious how it would work on the backend and with federation.

Is racism enshrined in the U.S. Constitution? How could the same Founding Fathers who endorsed the idea that all men are created equal also endorse the idea that some men are not? Here's why the 3/5ths compromise was actually anti-slavery. twitter.com/prageru/status/127 #Prager #Constitution

--
Full-List of bots: joejoe.github.io/mastodon

Show older