Show newer

@bagofshit @nobody@neckbeard.xyz No news yet of violence...but then again I was watching and the is no way to learn what's going on in the world

@null0x0 Beyond water, I can't think of things to eat, only things to avoid:

Lots of carbs or sugars
"Heavy" foods that require lots if digesting (it makes you tired)
Anything too spicy or you're allergic to that makes your stomach upset, as it will be very distracting

But this might not be a one size fits all solution

Any diet suggestions for optimal brain functions!
Thanks.

@nobody Yes, now maybe weirdos will stop trying to molest him.

@sev That's okay, I war probably a bit too harsh myself. I separate ideas from individuals and can really go after ideas I disagree with in a way that can sometimes be misconstrued as personal attacks at times; I need to sacrifice brevity for clarity. 🙂

@moth @jojo @realcaseyrollins

I love that you say

I argue that the chaos and volatility that you’re attributing to anarchy are actually coming from the political structure shifting.

You convey a point I’ve struggled to convey across the last month, very well. In a time where those who we’re supposed to consider authorities of current events are little more than yellow journals, I find it really important to find the right words and idioms and even religious stories that can better give a lens into what one is trying to describe. Language is, in the language of opsec, a vulnerability surface.

@moth @jojo @realcaseyrollins Thank you for this. I tend to think of anarchy from a very Machiavellian perspective — which is to say, States exist in a state of anarchy between each other, and citizens exist within the governments their states give them.

@realcaseyrollins @jojo I don’t think it does anyone any good to encourage the delusions these people have that CHOPAZZLE was somehow a separate country for a few weeks, or indulging them in their fantasies of violent anarchy. They like to take words and change their meanings, in order to justify themselves — my dog in this fight is I’d rather well-intentioned people didn’t aid them in that.

@kino @shebang

Just as there are different instances of government, there are also different instances of anarchy. The tensions that cause conflicts would do so in either case. (Is Somalia less violent with an official state?)

In both cases the pragmatic approach is to treat the world as if it were anarchist anyway. e.g. "I own a gun because I don't want to wait for the government response."

I argue that the chaos and volatility that you're attributing to anarchy are actually coming from the political structure shifting. In cases where the structure is imposing more, it's directly manifest -- cops forcing people to follow laws, etc. In cases where the existing structure fades too quickly the individuals have to adjust to the new reality drastically, and there's a flurry of imposition as new structure emerges and existing struggles can be expressed, but if the structure is repealed with intention, and in proportion to the ability of the individual to self-sustain, I don't think you would see the same chaos.

@sev @jojo This is true; they left, but retained their power, evidenced by them at least once sending EMTs & firefighters into the area, and then coming back and clearing the people out. 👍🏾

@realcaseyrollins @jojo My only disagreement would be that the governing authorities did exist, in the form of the Mayor and Governor, but they chose not to act specifically for reasons of maintaining their power within the sect that agrees with the insurgents.

@realcaseyrollins @tuxcrafting @shebang @jojo

Anarchy only describes the formal power structures, it doesn't dictate peaceful or violent, and you will find both. Somalia has been a poster-child for violent anarchy for a long while, while peaceful communities of anarchists are not even rare.

@sev @jojo Right! Well my point is it started out as anarchy, but people like Raz came in with guns and started bossing everyone around. And there was no governing authority or cooperative force to stop him. Point being, true anarchy leads to a power vacuum which is quickly filled by violent parties.

But perhaps I'm wrong about this.

Show older