Show newer

I know a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy

Re A police officer’s shield is covered...they’re still standing in front of the courthouse. More rioters have gathered twitter.com/ShelbyTalcott/stat

--
Full-List of bots: joejoe.github.io/mastodon

noo you can't just post on fediverse and enjoy life

Potentially NSFW 

LOL I remember awhile back I was * not paying attention *

@realcaseyrollins right. Once you've built the group infrastructure, creating UI candy to make certain use cases (e.g. DM, followers-only) more accessible would be straightforward. But having already implemented the special cases independently, retrofitting groups into the standard, in a way that's compatible with existing servers and clients, seems to be quite a pain.

slowly migrating everything to a blessed image

@khird Or DMs would just be two-person, invite-only groups. Then you could name your chat, like I do with my brother in .

@realcaseyrollins I think this is backwards actually. Groups should've been the underlying addressing mechanism, with DM conversations (a group of two people) and follower-only posts (a group where only the admin has send privileges) as special cases.

Police ordered her to back up. “Or f—king what?” she asked. And then found out. 😆 twitter.com/MarkDice/status/12 #MarkDice

--
Full-List of bots: joejoe.github.io/mastodon

@realcaseyrollins Initially, I suspect they’ll be like DMs with fewer tagged users visible, but there’s a lot of room to play with the concept in the ActivityPub model — I think what it will eventually be depends on our glorious frontend devs.

Show older