>computers are basically microfascism because eugenicists helped invent them
Good. Log off forever. I do not want to see anymore of this type of bullshit.
whoa, thing I dont like! oh my its facist!!!!
@xianc78 this is the faglord who was complaining about PewDiePie bringing in Fascists to FOSS or some shit.
So what, their "solution" to "fight" "FOSS Fascism" is to... make their own little club where it's only good socialists allowed? They assume that a dev is full of Hitler particles when they can't really control the unfortunate reality that letting their creations simply exist will let bad people use it... And as much as RMS is a commie jew, he accepts that, so ironically the person who could most fanatically lead the charge against what they hate in FOSS is their biggest enemy. They really don't expect their evil boogieman Fascists won't just steal their software out of spite. What are they gonna do, sue them? Call the police? Kill them?
It's funny, doing a meme like requiring the word "nigger" in a software license would probably stop them from using the software, so their own strategy of making gay CoCs and licenses to stop da Fash is really only effective against themselves.
The woke, far-left, Drew DeVault-aligned, anti-Stallman faction of the FOSS movement clearly has no idea what they are talking about.
Imagine being so far to the left that you think that Richard Stallman, someone who has openly supported free healthcare, taxing the rich, expanding the welfare state, and even a universal basic income, is somehow a far-right libertarian who supports bombing children (which he wouldn't if he was a libertarian btw).
These people are so far gone, that they think that because Richard Stallman keeps the FOSS movement politically neutral outside of challenging our current copyright laws, then that makes him "far-right".
The only reason why FOSS allows people to exploit others (outside of making it proprietary in the case of copyleft software) including committing war-crimes is that most other things created for practical use allow you to do that too. But when it comes to software, suddenly people feel the need to create contracts dictating what you can or can't do with said software. That's why we have EULAs when it comes to proprietary software, and free software does the opposite by giving us freedom 0.
Finally, you can never prevent the government, including the military from using your code. The government does what it wants and will break any license and get away with it. If the DPRK can violate the GPL and create a proprietary fork of Ubuntu, then the US military (or any other military for that matter) can use your code to bomb children.