@matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin
Again, that is the part I obviously agree with.
But I don't see the reason for it being free, mandatory, or cover the kids entire nutrition needs for the day.
@matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin
@NEETzsche @matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin
Yes, I do take libertarianism quite seriously, although definitely not the "nap" bullshit or the anarchist position.
A government should take care to build and protect infrastructure etc. But it should not be working as a charity. That only leads to creating a parasitic voting blocks.
I am not even sure If I like democracy to begin with. 
@matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin
@NEETzsche @matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin
I see, that neither you nor Matana understood my point, so it is very possible I worded it seriously incorrectly. 
@matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin
@NEETzsche @matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin
Yes.
I am saying, that if a kid is not fed by the family, it might be safer in a foster home at that point.
Kids have to eat. Obviously. But the OP was saying, that parents should have no responsibility to do so. And that was sickening.
@matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin
@NEETzsche @matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin
> For far too many kids in this country, school lunch (and breakfast) are their main source for a nutritious meal.
> Back when we lived in NYC, it was a big deal to have a snow day for schools because they knew those kids needed to eat...
I am sorry, but I don't see how else should I interpret that post.
@matana @renwillis @Lumeinshin