@matrix @LukeAlmighty Classic game theory: All groups being colorblind might produce the best results for all, but if ONLY your group is colorblind, while all others zealously pursue their own racial interests, your group ends up with the worst possible outcome. Your group pursuing its own racial interests will always be the "safe" option - and these days, we don't even have to guess, we KNOW that only White people are willing to even attempt colorblindness, and I guess at least White rightwingers are increasingly realizing that.

@matrix @LukeAlmighty Is it actually the ideal though? Let's pretend for a second that everyone does play by the rules, what do we get from each race?

From blacks we would still get jack shit as they have never invented anything, besides new ways to commit crime.

From East Asians, the Japanese are basically doing all the heavy lifting, but they are Honorary so they don't even count as East Asian. Chinese give us cheap construction of goods, Jungle Asians give us some spices that we've had access to for hundreds of years. Overall, very low value from East Asians.

Arabs don't benefit us at all.

Indians try to scam your grandma.

And jews are actively trying to make you extinct.

There is no real benefit for the White man to be colorblind because other races have nothing to give besides their cuisine.

@WhitestTemplar @matrix
You know the feeling, when you know the other person is wrong, but you cannot define it?

Something something, economy isn't measured only by the most productive individual, but requires global cooperation.... something you've wrong.

But, I cannot define it properly, so I get your point. Especially with sand people.

@WhitestTemplar @LukeAlmighty Yes, because you can select those that don't have negative qualities while having positive qualities, allowing for greater innovation.
The problem is that everyone has to be colorblind for it to work
https://detroitriotcity.com/objects/a2d6150f-3ac7-442c-8110-969d5ac3f016