Dom Lucre claimed he was the victim of censorship because the "Dems r peedooos" and he was just trying to "protect da children" *eye-roll*.
Republicans came to his defense, saying that his 1st amendment right was being violated.
Accounts like "EndWokeness" (allegedly Jack Posobiec) and "Libs Of Tiktok" and even actual politicians were demanding his reinstatement.
Hold up hold up hold up.
So now "right-wing"ers are saying that being able to view, possess and post "the stuff" is a 1st amendment issue?
Broooooooooo......
"I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!!!!!"
ひげ
@Aldo2 i think one thing we can all agree on is peter scully deserves to be hanged by his balls and anyone sharing any of his shit (let alone with a watermark) should not be given any grace whatsoever
@beardalaxy I think that's too heavy-handed and driven by hysteria.
It won't solve anything.
In fact, if the idea that simple possession or viewing would lead to such a violent response, why stop there? Why not just engage in the real thing at that point? "In for a penny, in for a pound"
Just as with prohibition, you're driving people into criminality because you aren't being fair and/or allowing them an off-ramp.
@Aldo2 oh I'm not saying he should get the same charge at all just that he shouldn't be getting off scot free
@beardalaxy OK, yeah, fair enough.
His punishment is that he has to write a personal letter of apology to Obummer haha
@Aldo2 a fate worse than death for a republican
@beardalaxy indeed.
However, I don't think the solution is more and more laws and heavy-handed enforcement driven by even greater hysteria.
I think the solution is rooted in actual understanding and fairness.
Do I think Dom Lucre should be sent to jail and raped to death by a pack of murderers for the crime of possession or viewing? No.
Japan (pre-June 2014) had it right.
@Aldo2 this is actually extremely fucked up and it shows that laws practically do not exist for anyone above a certain fame/monetary threshold.