YZZAJ @Jazzy_Butts@gameliberty.club

If I sound angry at religion it's because I have a good reason to be. Religion ruined my life and my family. Far as I can see, religion ruins entire countries. The stories are fine, so long as they're known to be STORIES, FAIRY TALES, NOT REAL, once mass psychosis sets in, I hate that shit.

@Kagekokoro @mario I respect a scrupulous and skeptical individual, I beseech the to eschew those doubts. And I forgive your rudeness, though none was asked. I'm just THAT nice

@Kagekokoro @mario Ha! Or you could have informed me, but I had a suspicion when you asked me leading, and pandering questions while opening, sad to see it confirmed, but always happy to correct when wanted.

@Kagekokoro @mario Your estimations of my possessions are unsolicited, and quite rude, as such

I got I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I-ed my day is ruined

@Kagekokoro @mario I'm sorry but I doubt your wisdom in this matter

@Kagekokoro @mario You have a very high estimation of yourself.

@sandy based lgf

@amerika shit fuck I'm all over the place I give up I think you get the idea though, I'm too drunk

@amerika obviously I mean any person not exhibiting non-white traits, would be colloquially called white

@amerika What percentage do I think this random cropping up of traits occurs, or what percentage of admixture do I think is required for such traits to crop up (at a rate I do not know)? It doesn't matter to me if traits pop up or not, the presence of the genetic code is the trait in and of itself, it is all that is required to make someone non-white, I'm using that term scientifically, since colloquially any person not exhibiting non-white traits would be called non-white, while those who did not exibit such traits but had "corrupted" DNA, would still be called white. And so, many, many "white" people are non-white, scientifically speaking, as many "Asian" people are non-asian, due to african or white genetic code, and as many africans because of their dna being mixed with non-africans.

@amerika Yes, I agree

@amerika Admixture is a broad concept, all human beings share genetic code, because all beings share genetic code. The difference between a black and a white is a spectrum, this is why a person with 1% black DNA looks white, just like how a blob of white paint with a miniscule dot of black mixed in will still look white, it is only in the details that it is not, and the details only apply in scientific matters, the majority of human life is not a scientific matter in my opinion, since science is an art applied in precise constraints, and that does not mirror normal life, scientific matters are much more taxing than normal life because of the focus required. And so I would see no problem calling someone with 1% black dna, and 99% white dna, white, even though it would be a euphemism, because in truth they would be mixed.

@amerika A white mixed with black, or "yellow"(I omit "red" because american indians are a type of asian), is not white, or black, or yellow, that doesn't mean they're any better or worse inherently as people.

@amerika Yes, I consider them white, I also base whiteness more on body structure than on skin color. So a very dark Indian is more white to my eye than a lighter skinned person with more "afican" features.

@amerika I consider Irish white, they are a type of white, and there are many types of whites.

@Kagekokoro @mario I don't see what that matters

@Kagekokoro @mario How would I know they were a cop if they were not in customary dress or told me they were? Same as a Muslim or Christian. Stopped reading after that tbh because you're being stupid.

@nagitoekogaeda hi