YZZAJ @Jazzy_Butts@gameliberty.club

@Horace I don't, I only learned that's where they first were published while looking for more

@Horace These comics are so hard to find!!! These used to be in hustler magazine I think. I'm sure there's hundreds but all I've found were like 5.

@bitterblossom As a suggested video or is my link broken?

Wtf I love Miles Morales now

https://youtu.be/y7d67DbTW9E

Antis need to hear this mans words

"But children CAN'T consent" the antis will say, "because they're TOO STUPID!", yet this is the same thing slave holders said about slaves. And for you raysis out there, it's the same thing racist Jews say about goys.

Me and antis are two sides of the same coin, I'm not talking about the fake antis or the fake maps who only want to hurt children. Antis want to protect children from sex positive abuse, while I want to protect children from sex negative abuse (positive and negative are not moral descriptors here, "positive" is abuse through sexual contact, "negative" is abouse through sexual neglect). At the end of the day we both want to protect children from abuse. Maybe one day, antis and maps can unify and fight against the fake antis and the fake maps, who don't seek to guide or help children, but only to harm and subjugate them, the fake maps do so for pleasure, as do the fake antis. The fake antis know that being a sick bible thumper who tells their son their penis is "dirty" will result in a child who grows up into, possibly, a serial killer with sexually abusive tendencies, that's their goal, they think it's the way things should be. In the same way, a fake map will feed a child compliments and praise while also punishing the child any time these acts are not reciprocated, which also will result in someone with the potential to become a serial killer with sexually abusive tendencies. Two completely different methodologies, yet the result is the same, a sick, broken, dangerous person. Fake antis and fake maps are the bad guys, real antis and real maps need to realize they both want to protect children, and raise them right, they just have to understand that they want to do that in different ways. The map believes (consensual) sexual contact (even verbal contact, such as sex ed) is the best way to raise a healthy person. The anti believes that sexual absence, the absence of sexuality, is the best way to raise healthy people. Notice that the anti position does not involve consent, the childs consent is not important according to the antis position, no matter how badly the child wishes to be freed of their bonds, to be able to choose or deny sexual contact, their demands will be refused. It may be this single fact that marks the division between anti and map. Both want healthy, happy children to grow into healthy happy adults, but only one side cares about consent. And it's not the side you think.

What if the three letter guys decide that twit boys actions are disruptive to their plans? I mean he's a foreigner so they could technically do whatever.

When a bully tries to hurt me because of my attractions I thank god that he is made of the same mushable material that I am. Turnabout is fair play.

@get I sang it to the tune of Son of Evil by GG Allin

A leftist and a rightist who want to delete threads they dislike both deserve [redacted]