JazzFLASH @Jazzy_Butts@gameliberty.club

Charlie Morningstar vs Sora🔞
"Commission"

#3d #nsfw #porn #sora #shota #shotacon #charlie #commissionopen #commissions #commission #ass #booty #butt #sexy #boy

I'm unsure about this idea... 💡🏒

New reward available: Riley and Disgust from Inside Out
Full resolution available for Fanbox subscribers only: https://oca.fanbox.cc/posts/10033467

Chowder | Thrice as nice
—
More Humanized panini hot off the press

Lisa getting spread WIP
Vegetarianism has its exceptions

Darkstalkers - Baby Bonnie Hood - Werewolf Ram

- Contact Details/Social Media/Donation Links/Subscription Membership exclusives (Linktree) : https://linktr.ee/hazardhead69
- the Original File link is available on my Fanbox for subscribed Fans, if you want it : https://hazardhead69.fanbox.cc/
- Direct Link : https://hazardhead69.fanbox.cc/posts/8941188

#格ゲーキャラ描こうぜ #BabyBonnieHood #Darkstalkers #Bulleta #BBHood #バレッタ #Werewolf #RedHood #DigitalArt #Capcom #FanArt #Videogame #Game #Gaming #Furry

A lot of CSA (child sexual abuse) research documents the harms of sexual abuse against children — but by focusing on sample populations drawn from therapy clinics or the legal system, it heavily overrepresents the negative tail of outcomes. That’s not surprising: these are the people already identified as harmed.

But this leaves us with a big gap in knowledge. We have very little data on the rest of the outcome curve — the full range of experiences, from negative to neutral to even positive. Despite that, just three key research streams give us a lot of the missing picture that most CSA-focused studies overlook.

First, Theo Sandfort’s work in the 1980s–1990s explicitly looked at the positive tail — individuals reporting minor–adult sexual contacts that were remembered as non-harmful or even positive. His research was controversial, but it reminded us that not all such experiences are automatically experienced as traumatic.

Second, the 1998 Rind meta-analysis aimed to capture the average pattern. By studying nonclinical, general-population samples — mainly college students — Rind et al. found that minor–adult sexual contacts were not uniformly or inherently linked to long-term harm, especially for males. This challenged universal harm assumptions but still didn’t capture the extreme cases or the full population curve.

Third, the large-scale Finnish adolescent study (over 30,000 participants) analyzed by Felson and later Rind gives us a rare look at the entire curve — from severely harmed to neutral to positive outcomes, all in one broad, representative sample. This study helps balance out the earlier partial views, offering one of the best empirical sources we have to understand the full variability in experiences.

Taken together, these research layers show that focusing solely on harmed samples gives us a distorted picture of the broader reality. For better science and better policy, we need to study the whole curve — not just the parts that fit moral or political assumptions.

Ryuuko cumming to shota cock.

Videl

Amy Rose!