YZZAJ @Jazzy_Butts@gameliberty.club

This bullshit lives in my head
https://youtu.be/2_TBE4RG2l0

If they can do it so can you, go have fun

https://youtu.be/uyRZ00UZ_9c

@HelterSkelter Oh fuck I love cubby boys, I wanna succ that belly and titties

My skin is gaining a translucent quality, you can see my blue/green veins, and I'm kind of tan so you know I must be staying inside extra hard.(haven't gone nini mind is racing

Everyone was a child at one point, and while a child they touched their nono parts many times

everybody molested themselves

nini fedi :3

@menthol6 @cummies I understand your position now! I agree!

@menthol6 @cummies if ironic hate speech is still hate speech, and ironic hate speech is appropriate contextually, that means not all hate speech is bad

@menthol6 @cummies If someone lunges at you, while drawing a weapon, you would be right to react defensively, even before contact has been made. In nonviolent circumstances their bodily movements would be free speech, but because of the context, they are a threatening act.

@menthol6 @cummies I see now, those are threatening acts, I agree, and I call them acts because I separate them from speech. For example, if someone says "I'm going to fucking kill you" but they are your friend, and you're both laughing, and you're playing a videogame, this is a non-threatening act. This will not cause you distress, or any ill effects long or short term. It is all context based.

@menthol6 @cummies Obviously, written speech isn't vibrational unless one wants to get nit picky about light waves. Anyway, speech being violence is eh, that's a grey area. I understand the concept, I just don't know if it holds together.