A lot of CSA (child sexual abuse) research documents the harms of sexual abuse against children — but by focusing on sample populations drawn from therapy clinics or the legal system, it heavily overrepresents the negative tail of outcomes. That’s not surprising: these are the people already identified as harmed.
But this leaves us with a big gap in knowledge. We have very little data on the rest of the outcome curve — the full range of experiences, from negative to neutral to even positive. Despite that, just three key research streams give us a lot of the missing picture that most CSA-focused studies overlook.
First, Theo Sandfort’s work in the 1980s–1990s explicitly looked at the positive tail — individuals reporting minor–adult sexual contacts that were remembered as non-harmful or even positive. His research was controversial, but it reminded us that not all such experiences are automatically experienced as traumatic.
Second, the 1998 Rind meta-analysis aimed to capture the average pattern. By studying nonclinical, general-population samples — mainly college students — Rind et al. found that minor–adult sexual contacts were not uniformly or inherently linked to long-term harm, especially for males. This challenged universal harm assumptions but still didn’t capture the extreme cases or the full population curve.
Third, the large-scale Finnish adolescent study (over 30,000 participants) analyzed by Felson and later Rind gives us a rare look at the entire curve — from severely harmed to neutral to positive outcomes, all in one broad, representative sample. This study helps balance out the earlier partial views, offering one of the best empirical sources we have to understand the full variability in experiences.
Taken together, these research layers show that focusing solely on harmed samples gives us a distorted picture of the broader reality. For better science and better policy, we need to study the whole curve — not just the parts that fit moral or political assumptions.
They did it to gay people. Did it to trans people. To pedophiles. And every other para. Riling up the mob is the easiest way to get the excuse you need to get rid of the people you don’t like.
@GrungeQueef those claws can crush bones like we can crush styrofoam
OCs - Cotton Candy - Hell
IMPORTANT :
Due to recent events, I'm looking for an alternative payment processor to PayPal. There is no reason to worry; this is a precautionary action to help me as well as my friends and clients to avoid censorship and scrutiny.
If you have any suggestions, answers, or recommendations, do contact me using the addresses in this link: https://linktr.ee/hazardhead69
#CandyUniverse #CU34 #CottonCandy #Candy #Commission #DigitalArt #FanArt #OC #Girl #Demon #Girl
@LukeAlmighty Holy shit it's a prequel
Guys I trust you more than random search results. How do you deal with an avoidant woman? A woman who won't say yes or no even though there's chemistry and tension, how do you break through her shell ("break" shouldn't conjure images of force it's a gentle cracking of a suffocating dome, it's saving her) and make (again, so many people think this implies some sort of force, no no no, when you make someone get out of the way of a speeding bus at the last second is that bad??? No it's heroic!) her understand that the two of you have permission from the universe to be together and to enjoy your time together and to be devoted to each other???????? You bros seem to have it figured out I know at least some of you faggots are married and shit.
Project ended.
Project status: Failure
Debrief complete.