@moffintosh
I almost thought it would be a great post, but he had to make it about climate change 
So fucking close
@thatguyoverthere@shitposter.club
It's a shitpost I'm just mocking him. I don't believe human behavior is a major contributor to changing climates (notashitpost). I think we do damage to the planet but most of the solutions to climate change ignore that damage and even increase it (we need to mine all the sand for cities because increased population density is good akshually and all the lithium for batteries, etc).
you got any good resources against the basic principle? (CO2 absorbs more infrared and therefore will lead to warming)
trying to understand a bit more.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ICE CORE SHIT, I know it was warmer in the past, that's not the point.
@WandererUber @moffintosh @thatguyoverthere
How about the balancing principle of CO2 helps the algy to grow in sea, changing the color, therefore changing the reflective properties of the earth surface?
@WandererUber @moffintosh @thatguyoverthere
Sorry, but I cannot find it. It was a video on radical methods of stopping the climate change, but it's only the single most over-talked topic on youtube, so good luck finding anything beyond the usual talking points.
@LukeAlmighty @WandererUber @thatguyoverthere Then where the fuck is it?
I had to take a heavy jacket to go out in my town in september less than 10 years ago.
Today I went ouside in a T-shirt and I was sweating
>see I told you hecking trumpanzees, climate change!
>it's cold
>see I told you libtards, no climate change!
https://www.space.com/tonga-eruption-water-vapor-warm-earth
@thatguyoverthere @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber
Tonga Eruption might be partially responsible for your warmer weather.
Dude, the whole fuckimg issue is OLDER than a single year. Not to mention that if anything the volcanic erruption would LOWER the temperature
The planet also isn't a static environment. Everything revolves around cycles. The climate has been warmer and cooler in the past and it will be warmer and cooler in the future.
Amd here's the thing: we're supposed to be in an ice age
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqwvf6R1_QY
Most people complaining about climate change live in cities.
Most people live in cities. The straight majority of the human populatiin does.
Weird since they are almost guaranteed to be the most detached from nature. It's almost as if most of the warming happens in and around them and not in the areas where natural landscapes are allowed to exist unadultered.
That's sophistry. Not only cities are more sensibke to temoerature rises (asphalt), but the warming doesn't just "in the areas where natural landscapes are allowed to exist unadultered", it's planet wide and affects all the ecosystems, increasing desertification and destroying crops, which can easily affect cities.
rtfa
>[climate change is] increasing desertification
you know almost nothing of the natural world outside of mass media and it shows. take the blinders off.
For the record: I believe in climate change.
@WandererUber @LukeAlmighty @thatguyoverthere
you know almost nothing of the natural world outside of mass media and it shows. take the blinders off.
I'm living it my fucking town. Tornadoes went from totally unknown to occurring twice a year, while almost killing my brother 3 years ago.
You're the one with the blinders on
@WandererUber @LukeAlmighty @thatguyoverthere Do you think I'm a moron or what?
@moffintosh @WandererUber @thatguyoverthere
🤷♂️
never ask a question you don't want the answer to
@WandererUber @LukeAlmighty @thatguyoverthere
and could trigger a cycle of stratospheric cooling and surface heating — and these effects may persist for months (Jan 2022) to come, according to a new study.
Big volcanic eruptions typically cool down the planet by belching sulfur dioxide into the upper layers of Earth's atmosphere, which filters solar radiation. Particles of rock and ash can also temporarily cool the planet by blocking sunlight, according to the National Science Foundation's University Corporation for Atmospheric Research.
bro...
@WandererUber @LukeAlmighty @thatguyoverthere
months (Jan 2022) to come
Dude, the whole fuckimg issue is OLDER than a single year.
@WandererUber @LukeAlmighty @thatguyoverthere
Dude, the whole fuckimg issue is OLDER than a single year.
I'm hoping you just don't know how to read and weren't intentionally selecting out a small passage to make it sound like you were right.
Give me all your sand. Be sensible
@thatguyoverthere @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber
https://time.com/5655074/concrete-urban-heat/
https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/un-issues-new-guidance-address-warming-cities
Because
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/122911/black-and-white-matters-but-why-and-how
Darker-stuff absorbs a wider range of lightwaves than clearer colored stuff.
Add less trees for shades and plants giving off water vapour to contain their temperature
>actually its not just warmer in cities
your argument:
>asphalt makes it warm and there are no trees here
nigga do you have brain damage or something?
@WandererUber @LukeAlmighty @thatguyoverthere
Found the trouble
Not only , cities are more sensibke to temoerature rises (asphalt)
So your position is that it IS only warming in cities? wtf then you're more of a denier than me at least kek
@WandererUber @LukeAlmighty @thatguyoverthere I'm saying, "not only what I said in the phrase before, but also cities are not immune to global warming, and are also sensible due to asphalt"
Trees create shade, and that's a good thing for the earth below. Another problem in the city is that the higher concentration of human activity generates heat which is not easily wicked away due to tall buildings being too close together.
@thatguyoverthere @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber
do you think that temperature exchange with asphalt only happens in one direction?
No, the problem with asohalt is that it's black, and accumulates more heat than lighter materials. It has a low reflectivity
The other problem with asphalt (and concrete) is that the raw materials are limited resources. Sure pulling the sand off the coast of some small island isn't affecting temperature directly, but it is causing shore erosion. Sand mining also ruins rivers and damages the local ecosystems wherever it's mined. It is funny to me that this clearly damaging practice is almost never highlighted, but the reason is clear. We are supposed to believe that living in more dense population centers is better for earth. It isn't.
Saṁain Goat No lol. Warming trends in earth's history make deserts smaller by increasing the amount of CO2 and precipitation. This one is no exception, the sahara is shrinking.
@Eiregoat @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber @thatguyoverthere
Bullshit
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/sep/02/desertification-barren-solution-famine-agriculture
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/desertification
https://earth.org/data_visualization/the-past-present-and-future-of-the-sahara-desert/
What he calls additional causes, are the true causes of desertification. Mismanagement and over or undergrazing.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/02/25/nasa-vegetation-index-globe-continues-rapid-greening-trend-sahara-alone-shrinks-700000-sq-km/
https://www.thegwpf.org/images/stories/gwpf-reports/mueller-sahel.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332220301007
@moffintosh @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber @thatguyoverthere It's geoengineering. They are deliberately changing the weather to push the climate change narrative.
James Corbett has covered this topic in detail multiple times.
https://www.corbettreport.com/geoengineering-the-real-climate-change-threat/
@moffintosh @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber @thatguyoverthere Exxon is also part of the conspiracy. They are a descendant of the Rockefeller's Standard Oil company. Big Oil is actually the one pushing the climate change narrative which is really a front for population control and eugenics (things that the Rockefeller's are known for).
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1446-james-corbett-on-the-post-carbon-energy-eugenics-hoax/
http://www.archive.org/stream/TheFirstGlobalRevolution#page/n85/mode/2up
@xianc78 @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber @thatguyoverthere
Big Oil is actually the one pushing the climate change narrative
That is nonsense, they wouldn't have hidden the info, and it goes directly against their interests as a business to sell oil. Also, they're actively funding climate change denial stuff, which makes again no goddamn sense by your theory.
https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-oil/exxon-climate-change-documents-e2e9e6af?st=tja2obal3ktd3wl&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/meet-the-money-behind-the-climate-denial-movement-180948204/
@moffintosh @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber @thatguyoverthere Shell is known for donating to climate alarmist organizations. The climate denial organizations that Big Oil are funding are controlled opposition.
@xianc78 @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber @thatguyoverthere
The climate denial organizations that Big Oil are funding are controlled opposition.
Why wouldn't the "pro-climate change" organizations be controlled opposition, by your logic? Not to mention, again, that they're business is selling oil, which produces Co2 as it burns, so it makes no sense to support "pro-climate change" organizations to restrain their market, and it makes all the sense to prop up denier ones.
And again, by your theory it makes no sense for Exxon to hide climate change reports when it already made accurate predictions decades ago
@moffintosh @LukeAlmighty @WandererUber @thatguyoverthere The mainstream climate denial organizations are just a bunch of conservatives worried that the whole thing is just to cripple the Western economy while countries like China surpass them. In reality, it's about a one-world government and population control.
Just take this excerpt from The Global Revolution by The Club of Rome
"In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself."
Guess who was one of the founding members of The Club of Rome? David Rockefeller.
@thatguyoverthere @LukeAlmighty
I don't believe human behavior is a major contributor to changing climates (notashitpost).
I think we do damage to the planet but most of the solutions to climate change ignore that damage and even increase it (we need to mine all the sand for cities because increased population density is good akshually and all the lithium for batteries, etc).
What
I think what I said was pretty clear. Which part was confusing?
