@beardalaxy
Colonizers/indigenous doesn't even make sense in European context
@teratology @LukeAlmighty @beardalaxy I do not think that is the part he takes issue with. The indigenous Europeans are overall… Europeans (Whites). The distinction doesn’t make sense when we are both the inhabitants and the natives
In his case, who would be the colonizers/indigenous people of Czechland? Both Czechs
@frost @beardalaxy @teratology
Exactly. The only nation I can think of, where colonizers have a significant meaning is UK with Muslim colonizers, but good luck explaining the currently ongoing colonization by non-europeans to the person who made this graph :D
@azure @beardalaxy @frost @teratology
Also, in case of muslims, it is immigration of population, that is actively violent towards native population, and want them all either dead or bend the knee.
That is the difference. I don't like the fact, that 300 000 ukies immigrated in a single year. But ukies don't believe my existence is a crime.
@teratology @azure @beardalaxy @frost
Did I say "all"
Did I use the word "all"
Or are you literally too retarded to respond to what I wrote, so you added a word so you can attack that singular added word instead of my argument?
@LukeAlmighty @azure @beardalaxy @frost @teratology This is why I have no problem with Asian and White immigration. they don't bring these kinds of problems with them. For the most part.