Show newer

@SirTenCyprids@noagendasocial.com
Most importantly:
DO NOT SERVE AS AN EXAPLE

Do not push to the point the punishment will seem justified. But spread the idea that the rules are both artificial and damaging to the good of every single person they touch.

After the overton window moves, push again.

@coldacid
So true.
The entire BLM/Chaz riots would end in 1 day, if 2-4 spikes appeared after the riots.

Forget shooting or lynching the anti-freedom assholes, it's time to bring back IMPALEMENT.

@Tepid_Tapir @rasterman @ChristiJunior@neckbeard.xyz @FashGordon @MaleGoddess @Sakiel @LadyMont @SphinxSister
Yes.
Because simps will ruin lives to increase their chance of getting laid by 0.

@rasterman
They say, that the dopamine hit is strongest when reward is uncertain... Let's say for example, when you have to wait for 2 years with the thought in the back of your head saying: What if I'm wrong? Am I going to get hurt?

Just to see you were correct all along.

@FF777
The strangest thing I saw from the leftist media is the inability to distinguish a proper order of cause and effect.

A local politician @mikulas_peksa once claimed that I just hate the EU, and that is the only reason I am opposed to clearly immoral actions, instead of even considering, that maybe I hate the EU, because they constantly behave in clearly immoral way.

And I see the same thing with people who claim that Trump supporters share his opinions only because they do follow him.

IDIOTS! Why is it so hard to consider, that MAYYBE people like Trump, because he talks about problems they were facing already?

I still have no theory on why is this kind of reasoning so prevelant. It might be a mere projection of NPCness, but I hate to use the projection as a theory because it is too easy to use, and assumes WAY too much about each instance of it.

@Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @matrix
>Since the US is ground zero for the globalist elites bent on the destruction of everything good, they have very carefully placed this idea that anything helpful anything at all that might help them win over their enemies is bad and thus they shun anyone that might lead them against zog.

Hard to argue agains that... Literaly. It is put so vaguely, that it could mean anything. So, I might actually even agree, but not when something is so vaguely said.

@LadyMont @FashGordon
>Be Woman
>Complain about having to make sandwhich for husband and do minor household chores that take maybe 1 hour a day to do.
>Leave husband and get job working for some fat Jewish Man at Megacorp 50 hours a week for 30k a year
>This is what true freedom is.

@LadyMont @ChristiJunior@neckbeard.xyz @FashGordon @MaleGoddess @Sakiel @SphinxSister
In short, rape is the single worst thing a man can do to a woman, but she is too lazy to say no.

Damn... If it is THAT HARD to say no to rape, how do you argue about it for so long now?

@SphinxSister
I should add that this is a fundamental difference between men and women since women strive for social consensus as a means of winning an argument while men use winning an argument as a means to achieve social consensus.

A feminine discussion would never start off with insults because that polarizes the floor and makes consensus via socializing/talking impossible. A masculine discussion welcomes polarization because it makes people choose sides and then fight it out..

It's perfectly plausible for a male discussion to start
>Anybody that doesn't want a tomboy gf is a retarded niggerfaggot, send poast

Yeah there's a bit of humor there but the spirit is confrontational not conciliatory. That's one of the problems that spinster.xyz faces when yall go outside your little playpen, you aren't used to a rhetorical punch in the face as a hello.

@ChristiJunior @FashGordon @LadyMont @MaleGoddess @Sakiel
@SneedsterSpeedster
The laconic detachment of the average shitposter is another of those men/women things, for various reasons women take this a lot more seriously than we do. Like what's the worst thing that can happen I get owned so fucking bad I delete my account and start over? Okay whatever.

Women take the social consensus much more seriously so when some dude finds a flaw in their reasoning and exposes it and adds a "this is why you dumb whores should be chained to the bed out of reach of modern communications" it hits much harder.



@SphinxSister @ChristiJunior @FashGordon @LadyMont @MaleGoddess @Sakiel

@Bangcubed @ChristiJunior@neckbeard.xyz @FashGordon @MaleGoddess @Sakiel @LadyMont @SphinxSister
Exactly. I always include a few insults in my initial arguments to see, if the person on the other side is capable to react to the arguments instead.

It is amazingly effective way to avoid arguing with total idiots.

@SphinxSister
Absolutely, the ability to mix invective and argumentation is critical because 90% of people can't handle either. Insults are a *screening mechanism*.

It's faster and easier to call someone a stupid cunt and see what their reaction is than to construct a 5 paragraph argument to get the same result. Not that resistance to insult is a guarantee of logical ability but an inability to suffer insult is a guarantee that they lack said ability.

Like if you call me a sexist racist fascist meaniehead my response would be "Yes".

@ChristiJunior @FashGordon @LadyMont @MaleGoddess @Sakiel

@SphinxSister @ChristiJunior@neckbeard.xyz @FashGordon @MaleGoddess @Sakiel @LadyMont
Congratulations. You let bad guy go, and now complain about the result.

Either you are lying, or you are the cause of the problem you claim to care about. Either way, good fucking job :ablobcool:

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.