Show newer

I have started to see this float around this afternoon and I THINK I may have started to operate with the NA mindset….or I’m full blown conspiracy but 😂😂😂 Bc MY thoughts when seeing this are…
1- if the government wanted us to stay home what’s easier than just sending us all “positive” tests?
2-they are to scheduled to arrive late January, what is January/February that they don’t want us paying attention to, staying home for?
🤔🤔🤔

Anyone else have thoughts? @Johncdvorak @adam

It's not a porn thread. It's Italian politics.

@mkultra
You're locked in 1 cell with these 4 people wof 1 week.

WDYD?

@Elfman
Not sure.
I am not a game developer, but I knoow that 1 bad decision can completelly de-rail an entire project.

Fallout 4 for instance was killed the moment someone thought they might include a dubbed protagonist. This simple decisiom multiplied price of every single branching decision. And because of that, you can no longer roleplay.

I still have no idea why they thought the most anoying faction should be the ultimate faction that cannot be destroyed. Instead of Yesman, who was invincible in New Vegas, they made invincible the FIRST NPC you meet and is anoying, so people got a bad impression of the rest of the game.

And last... Oh god, why is the scale so small.

I still remember only 2 cities in the entire game. 2 cities.

If there are more, they are criminally well hidden, But with 2 + 3 faction homes, that makes about.... 5 places on the entire map that will matter to you.

I have no idea what kind of development hell was F4 in, but it's hard to immagine it was made by the same people who made Skyrim.

It's interesting to go through the concept art of Fallout 3 and 4 and see how much more art deco and unique it was vs the final product. Curious of it was just a rendering budget/engine limitation issue or if someone higher up wanted something a bit blander and more consumer friendly.

@nerdman
Yes, the rent part is horrible, because it would give the government 1 generation, before they would own EVERY HOUSE and could return to standart tax/rent model.

That is also why I liked the HAS TO SELL part, since you're returning there to market-price ekonomy. If gov could set price/keep stuff, tbey can gain additional monopoly and power on anything realy fast.

@nerdman
Wait a minute...
Forcing government to sell everything... You didn't mention that part. :thonkjail:

Fuck you, you're starting to make sense. I'll need to study the hell out of this before I say something that might sound like an agreement.

@nerdman
I still have to hold my point:
It would lead to lazyness and wastefulness on levels we can barely imagine.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.