Show newer

@ChristiJunior @dave @KingSoldier @NEETzsche @nerdman @Matty @guts
I see it as white culture being a "lighting in a bottle" event. Same as creation of life on earth.
The most important part of this event being community need for long term planning for winter.

So, that explains in to me well enough. (as long as you accept, that Asians took a lot of inspiration when migrating.)

@beardalaxy
Thanks... I am honestly not sure even if I agree and why. :ablobwhee:

I might need a few days to let this one rest.

@NEETzsche @ChristiJunior @dave @KingSoldier @nerdman @Matty @guts
Yes, programming is hard to break, and it takes years to start breaking of all the layers...

@ChristiJunior @KingSoldier @NEETzsche @nerdman @Matty @guts
That is why I asked the definition of slavery.
If the slave is defined by results of lazyness and stupidity, then it will always be an anti-white issue, and there is no point of debating it.

If it is defined by extraction of resources enforced by violence, then white men are enslaved.

And I would love to hear @dave definition, but it has to be prescriptive, and without exception based language.

@dave @NEETzsche
I am pretty sure I did use it correctly, but who knows.

Either way, if you want, I will re-phrase the question.

Is there any difference, that could be characterized by a significant change in the concepts themselves, instead of just the same concepts being used under a different name?

Taxes are frustrating because they are (often) spent inefficiently. But the money is (ostensibly) being spent to make the general public’s lives better, which includes you. By contrast, slavery is an individual forcing you as an individual to work to advance his interests, without you being provided a wage, or having personal freedom. One is a lot more unjust than the other.

@dave @NEETzsche
This is a semantical difference.
Slave master used the money he collected to build houses, food and medicine to his slaves too.

Slaves had exactly as much freedom as the master allowed. And now, if some prime minister gets butthurt, you loose your bank account from day to day. You have no freedom a politician doesn't sign first.

Politicians also can choose how much money goes to their own interest as opposed to their slaves.

So, my question remains tha same. Is there a non-semantical difference?

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.