LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@KonataWagner1066 @applejack @dave
The problem with the Romeo and Juliette laws is, that it doesn't solve the education trap.

There is no reason a kid should study till 25. Programming doesn't take that long to make you employable. But we have filled education with so much random shit, that highschool absolvents are barely employable.

I am so pissed at the local right.
How stupid can you get, if you seriously consider the concept of people marying "a pedophile plot", but the same teens having free sex is ok.

@dave @applejack
The difference is, that I am not saying "stupid woman chose bad", but "all good choices women used to have are now gone".

@dave @applejack
Not entierly.
My point is more like:
-If they want a 4 kid family, they should start at 20 tops.
-They cannot start a family at 20 because thy have no security.
-Traditional system of security (Marrige) has been made impossible, until either one or both people have income. This doesn't happen till they are 25, because of the education system.

And at 25, woman is already in debt AND unable to have 4 kids.

It is a complex trap, but the result is the same. Women start considering marrige as an option by the time, the entire concept is pointless.

This is perfection.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFYJezHMYII

@dave @applejack
But thanks.
I think I made my point now. If you feel like there is something I should consider, you have my full attention.

@dave @applejack
> I don't think that's the universal college experience.

Why are you talking in absolutes? Ain't "It's making things much worse" enough? There will always be an exception to anything.

@dave @applejack
I meant the part, where women cannot possibly marry, since they are already on the way to get their "promissing careers"

@applejack
Do you see any logic in what I just described @dave , or does it all seem to you as a bunch of nonsense?

@applejack @dave
This is the hardest part, that poasters will never understand.

Hormones start raging at the age of 15. That is primary school. That means, that the girl cannot possibly marry the first guy, till 3 years later. Fuck that, she cannot even talk about it.

But 3 years later, she is already in high school, with a random set of people and away from her family. And this "friends group randomization" won't end up till she's 25.

@Matty @dave
If you cannot take me at my word, then I have no reason to continue.
Goodbye, and welcome to my block list. It is a verry prestigeous club, but you'll fit right in.

@Matty @dave
Age of consent is a bullshit that had to be made up as a result of people having sex without any connection to forming a family.

I believe, that marrige should be possible around 15, but pre-marital sex is just bullshit.

And I would even allow to keep age of conscent at 18, but I would place the marrige age lower, since family formation does require a lot of stability, that cannot be achieved, when you feel forced to study till the age of 25.

@Matty @dave
Yes, I know, that you guys are incapable to distinguish between ages 6,15 and 30, so I use the term "young", to mae sure there won't be an idiot who will think I am talking about 6 year olds.

@dave
No, it's not.
I am comparing what I see as most probable outcome based on a single variable.

Perfect speedruns are not a way to plan your life.

@dave
Why are you against a young marriage?
Don't you think it's better then letting them collect debt in uni, let them get ""tricked"" by chad and then force them to 9-5 till they end up on antidepressants?