LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
As I said before, (and you confirmed this), 0.3 is insanely low number of murdered women. We also both confirmed, that (0.3 per 100 000) is an insanely low number for murdered men.

So, if you see an issue, that both numbers are the same exact insanely low.... I am sorry, but there is no other way of reading it, then that you want one of the numbers to be higher.

Low murder rate is good. That goes for both men and women.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
A 0,3 per 100 000 is not a cultural problem, but a cultural victory.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
> Men are more likely to survive attack from a random schyzo

> Do you have a source for that?

Literally a reddit brain

@Jens_Rasmussen @RikaDerufu
Exactly. On the other side, you have violent gang wars, where nearly 100% of participants are men, and therefore, the ratio is "fixed" for this nutjob.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Yes. It does, because you might realize, that comparing the 2 low numbers will always result in a ratio between 0 and 1, and closer you get to 0 events total, the more random the ratio becomes.

Well, you would get it, if this entire conversation wasn't powered by your hatred of men.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Why aren't you screaming about the iceland then?

100 FUCKING PERCENT. ONE ENTIRE WOMAN!!!!

@Jens_Rasmussen @RikaDerufu
The ratio matters, because he grew up in a western man-hating mindset and cannot understand, that men living is not a bad thing.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
If number of men dying was 1... Just one per the entire country, and 4 women would die... PER ENTIRE COUNTRY.

Would you be panicking at an insane 80% rate?

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
But less women are being killed.
0,3 per 100 000. You are literally complaining, that this number looks bad, because men are surviving too. That is how ratios work.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Yes. As I said, you're just desperate for more men to die, no matter the reason

I don't care about your simping. But your self-hatred is literally the only issue here.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Rate 0.3 per 100 000.
As I expected, it's retarded.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
I think, this retard does not understand, that percentage between 2 issues does not show, how common each of the issues are in absolute numbers.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Oh no... 31% of women are homeless. What are we going to do?

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Go simp to someone who cares about your self-flagellation

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Or it indicates less material desperation among young men.

You told me to learn per capita in an example, where the ratio was 1:1.
Go simp to someone else.

@Jens_Rasmussen @RikaDerufu
Also, more importantly, he implies, that men being killed disproportionally more is the good outcome. That is my issue with his insane "learn per capita" claim.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Oh, tell me what do you think Per capita means...

And how it applies to this particular example.