Show newer

@fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @Curvin @bjolokalo
Don't worry, I also like jumping into a long threads without reading :D

Well, at least I am happy I got to form my thoughts for people in here to read.

@fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @Curvin @bjolokalo
An academic distraction, but this time, it's an advanced one, so I am happy to elaborate.

I do not agree with Jordan Peterson often, but on this topic, he formulated it perfectly. Freedom to speak is the freedom to THINK.

You need to hear an idea in order to even start thinking about it, and you do need other people to build on it. This is the reason, why you also need the ability to hear all versions of the idea you care about, not just an approved academic one. Because you never know where in the noise is the breakpoint you need to see a new truth.

So, why is freedom of expresion the subversion? because a thrown brick is an expresion of your idea. So is glueing yourself on the road to stop an ambulance. The left loves their "non violent" but deadly protests, and they will do anything they can to hide this psychopathic tendency under a wordplay. But does that brick thrown at your head allow you to think about the complex implications in the new law? I don't think so.

So, no. I am definitely not going to accept the frame of "freedom of expression".

@bjolokalo @Deplorable_Degenerate @Curvin
You are now literally comparing hand movement to rape.

I don't care if you're trolling or serious, since either way, continuing this debate would be worthless even for me.

@bjolokalo
Yes, when I found out the reach of speech limitations in Czech republic, I actually felt quite sick.

Most of the time, I am really proud of this nation, but one of our politicians is literally just going through a process for pointing out, that immigration won't solve all issues of society.

@Jens_Rasmussen
Yes, I just wanted to re-word it to the classical democratic argument.

@LukeAlmighty That's a complicated question.
If I said Yes I would love being able to speak whatever, but at the same time I would have to suffer the opinions of retards I do not agree with and I would be a hypocrite for wanting to smash someone's head in over a retarded thing they said.
However if I said No, the moment I get filtered for My speech I would quickly become rebellious and oppose it in any way I can in order to be able to be heard again.
There is no easy answer that you can go with, without sacrificing something to make it work as written.

The imperium of men is the worst governance system to exist... except for literally all other. :smugsargon:

Do you believe in a full free speech?

(If your answer contains the word "but", just click no you hypocrite)

@lanodan @volpeon
I love the ethernal argument between these two positions on SW.

I have just realized, that Destiny is completely right about one thing, but he still refuses to see the actual big picture.

Yes, I do want Trump to win no matter what the fuck he does just to own the libs.

But, It is not because I like Trump. And that part is something he will never understand :ablobcool:

@pmjv
Nah...
To je pohled slabocha. Pokud nemáš respect k národu, národ nemusí mít respekt k tobě. A každý má právo si sám vybrat, kde má svou hranici.

@mushroom_soup @All_bonesJones
My feelings don't care about your facts.

You guys are literally trying to debate morality. Morality is a subset of feelings. If you feel like employment is slavery by definition (for example), no amount of lawfare or legal frameworks will change it.

@All_bonesJones @mushroom_soup
Because if you were to talk openly about the nature of sexes, out entire law network would collapse overnight. The price is just way too high for most people to allow the thought.

Same sadly goes for IQ, race or even religion.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=IV0g8hcg

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.