Show newer

@nike
Wait a minute...
Are they seriously celebrating a murderbot murdering against orders?

I don't know what's worse. The story being fake, or it being true.

@Curvin
Oh shit...

It was announced in Davos during WEF...
Now it makes sense :ablobwhee:

The generally accepted "buts" are:

1. Fraud (knowingly lying to someone to take advantage of them)

2. Conspiracy "I just SAID that anyone who kills trump will get a million dollars in Monero, what ever happened free speech?! I thought this is America!!"

3. Child porn "Wow look, it's just a bunch of random words, totally speech, but when you use this little program to decode it, it's actually pedobear.jpg" - Interestingly, this is the only "speech" that is restricted not because of its result but rather because of it's origin.

4. Incitement to violence/crime: Trying to manipulate someone into becoming violent and/or breaking the law. A fairly straightforward case would be if a hypnotist were to hypnotize people and tell them to go do crime. But this is a controversial topic, there have been cases where factual news was suppressed by the argument that "if people heard that, they'd riot", which is very much bullshit.

An interesting case was in the 60s(?) someone had a kids TV show and they told kids to dial some phone number that was a pay number (like those old phone sex things). I don't think they really lied, but they did get in trouble because it was considered manipulative.

@themilkman
I didn't even think of that one.

That makes it even more stupid then, since it means it is no longer unique either.

@cjd
My point is, that in the same way as you wan to make sure, that you can say female to make sure no dudes are included when you say "women", I want to find a way to say "calls to violence" without making literally all of right wing thought illegal by misinterpretation.

It was not an assumption of bad faith from you. The problem is, that this definitional line was already broken.

The idiot investors decided it is time to create a new EUROPEAN SOCIAL NETWORK :ablobcheer2:

1) It is called W
I wanted to give you an article about it, but the name is unironically so retarded, that I wasn't even able to look them up.

2) the main selling point is:
You need to dox yourself to create an account

Good luck...

@cjd
I would mostly agree, but the left had managed to subvert the points 2 and 4.

These people seriously believe, that saying your nation is worth protecting is a direct call for genocide, while they also claiming, that saying that whitey doesn't have any right for a job to feed his family is completely ok and violence free.

So, until I find a way to define these terms in a subversion free form, I cannot accept your framework, even though it would be completely correct in a sane world.

@Deplorable_Degenerate @fish @Curvin @bjolokalo
Do you seriously not understand, why I made the point that I am talking about free speech, not freedom of expression for this exact reason? Because it's a phrase so open, it allows in the most insane acts, so you can start banning it all together?

It's the same as switching gay rights to LGBT+ rights.

@Deplorable_Degenerate @fish @Curvin @bjolokalo
Freedom of expression behind closed doors sounds to me like something Destiny could come up with next week.

You can say everything you want in your safe box, but not here. Here is the quality speech zone.

I used to think that women aren't good at picking up men...

Bruh, when a girl in Aerith costume gives you flower, you hit about 20 romantic points in 3 seconds. Maybe guys should just step up their game after all :ablobcatsweatsip:

@Alex1488
Please, send me a photo once you manage to create that statue of verbal briliance.

@beardalaxy
This is the direct definition of hate speech.

Ok, thanks for explaining yourself.

@beardalaxy
Also, here is a truly important fact.

> your rights end where someone else's begin<

This is not a description of your position, it is a definition of word.
No matter where you actually believe the line is, it will always fit that retarded line.

Should mother be able to abort?
Obviously. The kid's right to live only begins after the right to body autonomy of the mother. BRUH...

Should mother be able to abort?
Obviously. The mothers right for body autonomy only begisn after the right of baby to live. CHUD...

@beardalaxy
No idea why you would ever compare something so civilized as speech to anarchy, but I think you are in a clear "no" at this point.

Wait the fuck up.
The entire game is pre-rendered .Why does it look like fucking 15FPS?

Show thread
Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.