LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@coyote @Wanyo
The most charitable interpretation out there was that he was under a watchlist before the attack, and CIA tried to cover a fuckup of the century.

And that was the MOST CHARITABLE interpretation of what happened.

@picandor
That is, because you DO have
1) Terabites of data
2) Enough of the information encoded inside of the studied material itself.

But yeah.. To me, it was immage enhancement. That thing is pure magic.

@picandor I do not think it is arrogance, I just truly believe that people do not understand what the real options of AI are.

In the same way that people use smartphones for facebook, but would never understand if I told them, they have a PC capable of emulating old consoles.

Or even more critically, it's as if they had a tank and were wandering, why is it not doing well on a racing track. It truly amazes me, just how incompatible the AI is with our usual understanding of the world.

But that also leads to shit as our university class thinking that a fixed conversation tree is an IT university worthy AI capable of getting us a job in the field.

@picandor
That is why I'm asking.
Either, she is the original person, and that would mean, that she is not pedo, but is gay. But, if she is only the new person, that wouldd make her pedo, but not gay.

Someone chose both, but that would mean, that gayness is contained in soul, while childhood is a bodily thing...

@picandor @Nudhul @PonyPanda @Shadowman311
Nah... until an AI can go with you to the pub, drink a beer and talk about newest marvel movie, it is obviously inferrior to humans on every level.

Turing test is an artefact of a lost era constructed around a false perception of AI limitations. Give it up already.

What is wrong with people?

Why is it so important for humans to point at particular social interactions or particular tasks to prove, that we are better then AI?

We're not smarter then AI, and the ammount of tasks we're better at is shrinking every single day.

@Nudhul @PonyPanda @Shadowman311
you cannot be serious

@Nudhul @PonyPanda @Shadowman311
That does not matter.
Your phone could beat you in chess 100 percent of cases. Computers have won in chess since deep blue.

Computers are better at math since the very begining. They will soon even be better drivers.

But the most important part is, that once they do break the "better then human" barier in any skill, they will be better in that skill forever.

@Nudhul @PonyPanda @Shadowman311
Ton't take it personally. It is smarter then any human, that will ever live.

@Nudhul @PonyPanda @Shadowman311
AI is not stupid, It's smarter then you will ever be.