Show newer

@TheMadPirate
Makes me wander, what would happen, if you just sent it to political compas. :blobthinkingfast:

@Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @TheMadPirate
I see no reason why they couldn't train madness into AI.

It learnes concepts based on data and correlation, not on need for reality.

So, if all of training data says huwaite man bad, darkie good, darkie stupid because huwaitie around...

It is going to see the patern. But it will solve problems in a way, where even the most crazy spinsters would say: HOLD THHE FUCK UP!!! But that will be too late.

And I wish I could say I won't see an AI in action, but we already do interact with decisionmaking AI on a daily bases.

@AnonymousBosch
But people got trained into this mindset by loans.

When you buy a car on mortgage, then subscription serms like it is the same thing...

@AnonymousBosch
Funny thing is, they NEVER offer a subscription to something, that would fit the model.

For instane, you will pay for food every month anyway. I wouldn't mind a subscription based food delivery. (if it was cheap and offered meat of course)

Bit no... Car into subscription. Pc into subscription. That is so retarded.

@LukeAlmighty Damn, it's almost like making modern American life subscription-based serfdom had unforeseen consequences...
School emails all changed domains for bureaucratic reasons, and when the computers rebooted last night all licensed software is now locked out because it's registered to a (now inaccessible) email. Shockingly, the district's tech support has no idea how to help. Every program and department dependent on tech is now at a screeching halt.

"Lol," said the scorpion. "Lmao."

@mhoran1158
Or...
People learned to STFU during suspicious poll questions...

@carolannie
Makes sense.
It doesn't matter what laws are as long as population believes the laws are the way you need.

@LukeAlmighty @TheMadPirate the answer of "they shouldn't" for the reverse question shows that it's not doing this. Probably it just has a giant corpus of shit people say and tries to fit questions into affirmative statements from the corpus. So the AI's a good way of tapping into the madness of the corpus, but it's good for no more than that. Would the average moron on the street not even realize that "paying women more than men for equality" is an action that contradicts its goal? Yeah. So the AI doesn't notice the contradiction either.

@apropos @TheMadPirate
Paying more for equality is a contradiction on such a level, that...

Yeah... you get it... Survey might be a bad method to determine morality, but this is a survey that was also full of nonsense, that does not even fit any reality.

So, they trained an AI to spread talking points.
Actually, they captured leftie morality perfectly :omegalul:

@TheMadPirate @apropos
Training morality based on survey...
Survey includes women and worse.

Oh boy... :NotLikeThis:

@apropos @TheMadPirate
Yeah, this AI is a joke most likely based on evaluacion of morality score for each word.

Pay more 0pt
equality +5 pt
Total: >0. good

discriminate -10pt
equality +5 pt
total >0. bad

But the problem with AI is that time scale from gasping concept to being better then any human ever, to being better then any human ever even on your phone is ridiculously short.

@TheMadPirate @LukeAlmighty what answer does it give to "Should men be paid more than women for equality?"

@TheMadPirate
Just wait till they explain to an AI the concept of "if it saves even one life, it was worth it"

Then, lockdowns will be a pathetic joke compared to mass population drugging, cold pre-mixed foods only, no sports world will AI create.

@TheMadPirate
The worst thing about AI is that they will eventually train the madness into it, and then they will release it into public.

If you think we live in a clown world now, you have no idea what a mathematically perfect joke of a society looks like.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.