LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@roboneko @ChristiJunior @SpurgAnon
No, I meant commonlaw marriage.
Because it isn't your decision if you're married. The judge decides that. That is the entire point of my previous post, and I am quite disappointed you didn't get it.

@roboneko@breastmilk.club @roboneko@bae.st @SpurgAnon
I also see the benefit of two gay people committing to each other. And guess what? Their commitment is absolutely different on the fundamental level. And they do deserve the right to form their own boundaries without some fat politician fucking it up.

@roboneko@breastmilk.club @roboneko@bae.st @SpurgAnon
Do you mean the law or the social interaction?

Of course I see the benefit of 2 peoples saying "I am fully committed to this".

Marriage law on the other hand is a legal trade document based around creating the conditions for leaving. And that is the exact opposite.

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
I have been writing my non-religious reasons for abolishing legal marriage for the last several posts.

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
WHERE DID I MENTION RELIGION FUCKFACE?

@roboneko @ChristiJunior @SpurgAnon
> Common law marrige.
So, do you agree, that if you let me live with you for reasons of rent, and we live together long enough to enter a common-law marriage (because, time is a possible trigger), then I can take half of your shit?

Or is there something, that is making the marriage system abusive beyond comprehension, and making it even wider is retarded?

@rasterman @ChristiJunior @SpurgAnon
Sure bruh
https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2021-08/pope-francis-appeal-covid-19-vaccines-act-of-love.html

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
Sorry, but I missed the argument.

> There has to be a good reason
That is the premise, but without a good reason, you are admitting defeat.

Yes, there has to be a reason. And without it, this shit is indefensible

@ChristiJunior
This isn't California

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
They seem one size fits all, because that was literally the point of the law you're defending now.

Finally.
8 minutes outside of the faggot month.

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
So, respond already.
WHY DO WE NEED A SINGULAR LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVERY POSSIBLE COMBIMATION OF LONG TERM COHABITATION?

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
The natural situation is: people will form groups of mostly 2, and sometimes have kids.

The fact, that the state needs to fuck this natural instinct up with 100 pages legal document is disgusting to me. And now, they will push the same dystopian control on gays too.

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
That's actually my problem too.
There are no alternatives to this legal contract, that obviously doesn't fit all the situations.

And by using this exact version now even on same sex couples, it is even less adaptive to the individual needs.

@famardy
My step mom called me, how excited she is about this movie, and that she will go to cinema to celebrate an anniversary...

I cannot stop it...

@Kagekokoro @D-Droid
I would actually love to play some re-make or even a game inspired by the original monster hunter...

But assassins creed? why? It even had a PC release.