Show newer
@RikaDerufu @LukeAlmighty @Jens_Rasmussen I don’t see why it’s important to divide the statistic especially in one of the safest countries on earth. Wanting to focus on one or the other implies it’s less important if one of them dies. Japan already has one of the lowest rates in the world, I don’t see a problem here other than having a feminist chip on one’s shoulder over Japanese society.

@RikaDerufu @mischievoustomato @Jens_Rasmussen
But you complained about this one too. It was your original thesis, and you told me to learn the meaning of per capita, when I said, that this ratio looked ok to me.

I am seriously trying to get to what your thesis actually is.

@sun_eater
Also true, that women in western media are portrayed as much more psychopathic and incapable of love, when compared to Anime.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
You literally compared about a ratio. You confirmed several times, that your issue is, that the ratio is close to 50:50.

But even at a 0:0, the ratio would still be 50:50. I am not arguing in bad faith, I am just seriously telling you, that you chose one of the safest countries in the world to complain about being too dangerous, based on a ratio, that is "high" only because it's safe for both sexes.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
As I said before, (and you confirmed this), 0.3 is insanely low number of murdered women. We also both confirmed, that (0.3 per 100 000) is an insanely low number for murdered men.

So, if you see an issue, that both numbers are the same exact insanely low.... I am sorry, but there is no other way of reading it, then that you want one of the numbers to be higher.

Low murder rate is good. That goes for both men and women.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
> Men are more likely to survive attack from a random schyzo

> Do you have a source for that?

Literally a reddit brain

@Jens_Rasmussen @RikaDerufu
Exactly. On the other side, you have violent gang wars, where nearly 100% of participants are men, and therefore, the ratio is "fixed" for this nutjob.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Yes. It does, because you might realize, that comparing the 2 low numbers will always result in a ratio between 0 and 1, and closer you get to 0 events total, the more random the ratio becomes.

Well, you would get it, if this entire conversation wasn't powered by your hatred of men.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Why aren't you screaming about the iceland then?

100 FUCKING PERCENT. ONE ENTIRE WOMAN!!!!

@Jens_Rasmussen @RikaDerufu
The ratio matters, because he grew up in a western man-hating mindset and cannot understand, that men living is not a bad thing.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
If number of men dying was 1... Just one per the entire country, and 4 women would die... PER ENTIRE COUNTRY.

Would you be panicking at an insane 80% rate?

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
But less women are being killed.
0,3 per 100 000. You are literally complaining, that this number looks bad, because men are surviving too. That is how ratios work.

@RikaDerufu @Jens_Rasmussen
Yes. As I said, you're just desperate for more men to die, no matter the reason :omegalul:

I don't care about your simping. But your self-hatred is literally the only issue here.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.