Show newer
Imagine how pissed the jews have to be right now that one of the biggest evening news anchors went and told them to go to their website and observe the absurd double standard that jews hold when it comes to immigration. As I said earlier, I am healthily skeptical of exactly what Tucker's role is in the grand rhetorical game. I won't overindulge myself in this event, but it is a noteworthy event. A lot of the jews' power is predicated upon people's unawareness of that power (and even people's unawareness of jews existing as a group with interests). A large media anchor upending that strategy will certainly have certain people seething. It will be interesting to see how they deal with this situation.

A cynic (and there's a certain part of me that thinks this is a possibility) would say that this is just PhD level finklethink to trap people into a "safe" acknowledgement of the JQ. However, I don't think there really is a kosher way to "contain" the JQ. If they are at the point where they are essentially trying to inb4 the JQ, then they are getting really desperate and making a big mistake. There's no real kosher way to approach the JQ--the amount of effort you would have to keep someone aware that jews act in their own group's interest and act in a way that is contrary to what you as the "average american" want--and simultaneously keep them from retconning your own kosher history and forming their own opinions on the holobunga is astronomical.

In a more formal way, I would classify any initial acknowledgement of the JQ as an unstable equilibrium. In essence, that equilibrium only exists in theory because if you deviate any epsilon > 0 off of the equilibrium, you end up somewhere else in the long. Interestingly enough, I wrote a rather autistic post on BANG about how Tucker's show essentially tries to keep people at an unstable equilibrium in the political sense. Maybe this is just a shift in strategy to move this unstable equilibrium a little bit closer to the natsoc zone. If they really are doing that, I just don't think it is in any way tenable (even in the relatively short term) and therefore that is why I think there is at least a modicum of this event that is genuine. If the jews really think they can hold people at the event horizon of national socialism, they are really fucking stupid. My bugman reference of this article is that it would be like the jews keeping people in a place like the Collector base from Mass Effect 2.

I realize this post ended up being really long and autistic so congratulations if you made it this far.
Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.