Show newer

Jako vždy úplně mimo...

A já už doufal v radikální změnu k lepšímu. Bakterie imunitní vůči antibiotikům jsou jednou z hrozeb, které jsou potvrzené a mohou hodit lidstvo o staletí to minulosti. Jednoduché operace budou opět nemožné, pokud jediná bakterie zanítí ránu. A nemoci, ze kterých se za 2 týdny "vyležíme" začnou zabíjet.

Jak nám dojdou variace antibiotik, jsme v prdeli. Toto není vtip, toto není diskutované. Narozdíl od globálního oteplování, na tomto se vědci doopravdy shodnou.

A přesto dáváme antibiotika na virální chřipky, dáváme je zvířatům... SAKRA, TOTO NENÍ SRANDA. Jako vždy pravý opak toho, co jsem doufal že uslyším.

Forget shooting or lynching the anti-freedom assholes, it's time to bring back IMPALEMENT.

@LadyMont @FashGordon
>Be Woman
>Complain about having to make sandwhich for husband and do minor household chores that take maybe 1 hour a day to do.
>Leave husband and get job working for some fat Jewish Man at Megacorp 50 hours a week for 30k a year
>This is what true freedom is.
@SphinxSister
I should add that this is a fundamental difference between men and women since women strive for social consensus as a means of winning an argument while men use winning an argument as a means to achieve social consensus.

A feminine discussion would never start off with insults because that polarizes the floor and makes consensus via socializing/talking impossible. A masculine discussion welcomes polarization because it makes people choose sides and then fight it out..

It's perfectly plausible for a male discussion to start
>Anybody that doesn't want a tomboy gf is a retarded niggerfaggot, send poast

Yeah there's a bit of humor there but the spirit is confrontational not conciliatory. That's one of the problems that spinster.xyz faces when yall go outside your little playpen, you aren't used to a rhetorical punch in the face as a hello.

@ChristiJunior @FashGordon @LadyMont @MaleGoddess @Sakiel
@SneedsterSpeedster
The laconic detachment of the average shitposter is another of those men/women things, for various reasons women take this a lot more seriously than we do. Like what's the worst thing that can happen I get owned so fucking bad I delete my account and start over? Okay whatever.

Women take the social consensus much more seriously so when some dude finds a flaw in their reasoning and exposes it and adds a "this is why you dumb whores should be chained to the bed out of reach of modern communications" it hits much harder.



@SphinxSister @ChristiJunior @FashGordon @LadyMont @MaleGoddess @Sakiel
@SphinxSister
Absolutely, the ability to mix invective and argumentation is critical because 90% of people can't handle either. Insults are a *screening mechanism*.

It's faster and easier to call someone a stupid cunt and see what their reaction is than to construct a 5 paragraph argument to get the same result. Not that resistance to insult is a guarantee of logical ability but an inability to suffer insult is a guarantee that they lack said ability.

Like if you call me a sexist racist fascist meaniehead my response would be "Yes".

@ChristiJunior @FashGordon @LadyMont @MaleGoddess @Sakiel

@LadyMont @MaleGoddess @FashGordon @Sakiel @SphinxSister

rapes by white guys go unreported every rape by niggers is counted that’s why niggers are over represented in crime statistics trust me, I’m a lunatic with a spinster account

@Dingo123 @Radfemmery @LadyMont if women had an self control they wouldn’t care about abortion LOL also is this dingos burner account
@AnimeTradCath @FashGordon @LadyMont

Because when a woman is such a loser that she has absolutely nothing going for herself, she falls back on the one and only thing that she will always have, which is the power of granting sexual access.

In their 20s, women can basically dictate the terms of all social interactions with men on this basis alone. With this hammer in hand, it is hopelessly tempting to see every problem as a nail. Once they pass into their 30s and hit the wall, if they became dependent on controlling men through sex as their only life skill, then they have to switch to the indirect strategy of speaking for other, younger women, and hoping they will collectivize on this basis, giving them back as much of the social power they had in their 20s as they can cling to.

The big problem with this strategy is that it is dependent on the cooperation of men. Maintaining sexual interest in women and protecting the high value of their consent is a job that women outsource to men because they cannot realistically do it themselves. With every wave of feminism, women price themselves out of the market so hard that it turns a lot of men into misogynists who otherwise would never have been. They will either check out like a MGTOW, or they will be primed to organize with other men to fix their nation on a systemic level, as the NatSocs do, with the intent of curtailing women's rights to reasonable constraints, among their other plans for correcting society.

This is why we have women frequently complaining "Where have all the men gone?" After abusing men collectively for so long, the only ones who are still willing to simp for women are irredeemably unfuckable soycucks. Any man who is desirable will have become a misogynist to some degree, and is inaccessible to women unless they significantly lower their price. Even then, they risk a fuck and chuck if they don't permanently drop the feminism in exchange for picking up a domestic skill or two and replacing the selfish, shitty parts of their personality with more pro-social ones.

That's a very tall order for someone who's been high on the mountain for ten years. Far easier and more tempting to just keep beating on the same old drum. At least the cats will always need you.

@ChristiJunior Always consider the source when speaking with someone. Start with their username and avatar. Engaging in avatar physiognomy can be even more telling than real physiognomy, since avatars betray what someone identifies as, what they want to be, as opposed to what they were actually born as. Some avatars are nonsense like abstract shapes or a quotation that’s too small to read when downsized, but most avatars, especially ones with faces prominently displayed, speak volumes.

Let’s take a quick look at a few avatars from spinster.xyz:

@LadyMont wants to be an uppity cunt from the British upper class, who either has no children at all or hates all of them, especially her sons. She thinks that snarky remarks with a thick British accent is the height of whit, with the “h.” In her mind, the best way to get back at that automechanic she fucked in her teens on the hood of his shitbox car, who then proceeded to not marry her on the spot afterward, is to import tons of pakis.
@EmmaFaber identifies as a mousy little American girl from the 1960s with a history of severe abuse. It’s uncertain if the abuse actually happened or if it’s pure fantasy, but it’s almost certainly real in her mind.
@BILLSan345 identifies as himself. However, he wants you to know how thoughtful and concerned he is by how he puts his finger on the side of his face and looks at the camera, like he’s listening to your wahmen problems earnestly.
@sunspot fancies herself the height of womyn beauty, the ultimate geisha for hire for only the most respectable male clients, who she hates because they’re constantly raping her by existing. She cuts your dick off after sucking it for $6 million shekels in her fantasies.

Hopefully this introduction to avatar physiognomy has been entertaining and informative.

@SphinxSister @FashGordon @MaleGoddess @Sakiel

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.