Show newer

@LukeAlmighty they threw away their own rules on producing drugs. i guess standards arent a real thing. if they were going that route, they should simply have opened the market for everybody, and immediately it would have been found that ivermectin and HCQ worked. and they could have made those easily available and cheap -- or just let the market work. of course being government, which is self-service called public service, they did the exact opposite. killing unknown numbers.

Who cares? We live in a society where human lives don't matter but capital.

Victorians knew arsenic was poisonous. The business was going great. Century later group of car manufacturers was testing diesel fumes on humans and monkeys. In 2021, just 3 years after "public was shocked", 1,680,512 audi cars were sold.

What's my point? I don't know. Exposing such information to the public is not working. Convicing the public that doing this may stop current action but won't change the game.

Maybe a deeper, systemic change is needed. Maybe we should not point a finger a companies but at people. But how when it is always a company that is present at courts and who led the "research" is a confidential information?
@dave what bothers me the most is that marketing like this prevents the real technology from being sought, because people think we have it already.
want AI? too bad, we have machine learning "AI"
want VR? too bad, we have motion sensing and display-glasses "VR"
want hoverboards? too bad, we have segway-wheel "hoverboards"
want 3d displays? too bad, we just really good at drawing triangles on 2d displays
want to see motion? too bad, we have animated "motion pictures"

They even call it a motion picture to reinforce that idea, too. There is no level to which they won’t stoop.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.