LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

there's a fire gyarados hanging out in my base
it's not in my list of active pals but he's just kinda there and eating my food while boss music plays

@perfect_brains "But how does Satanic, pedoGroomer subhumans waging war on innocence, language and the natural order itself affect YOU?"

RE: https://social.freetalklive.com/users/perfect_brains/statuses/111875595931629006

IMG_20240204_090123_804.jpg

@mischievoustomato @berkberkman @ChristiJunior nessa is darker and therefore more in need of aryan genes

mom, can we have a steam deck?

no, we have a steam deck at home

steam deck at home:

#Linux #LinuxMobile #postmarketOS

(hint: Matt Walsh is a faggot, a homosexual)

"Why would you think that a bodybuilder who benches 550lbs could die if he leaves an infected wound untreated?"

@ninapaley @alex @Nudhul Wondering why?

Yes, there are countless examples of this. Mark Cuban is a recent and prominent example who has been getting called out for this two-faced behavior because he waded into a debate with Elon Musk about the BLS data showing that only 6% of the jobs recovered since the coof went to white men.

Ask American jews whether or not they're white and you'll get situational answers even though most Ashkenazim are predominantly European genetically, having lived and intermarried in Europe for a millennium or so.

Now I find myself wanting to get into how you can draw a direct line from the NYT 1619 project, the entire purpose of which was to put all the blame for slavery on the heads of white Americans in the 21st century while remaining utterly silent on jewish involvement, right to the recent events at Harvard, but I feel like I've written enough about all of this for the moment.

@snugglefist @LukeAlmighty @alex @ninapaley not to mention their twofaced nature when it comes to chastizing "fellow white people" for their original sin

Yes, jews will regularly express frustration or confusion at being grouped together, but this is inevitable because of how they will defend individuals of their group as a group. The ADL is a perfect example of this. It's been 110 years and they still act like Leo Frank dindu nuffin.

Tucker Carlson is an example of someone who somehow ran afoul of this just by talking about mass migration and the involvement of people like Soros. To the best of my knowledge, he never once mentioned on Fox that Soros is a jew, but being willing to talk about this in terms of "replacement" ultimately cost him his job.

If you generalize about jews and their cultural norms and values as a group, you are labeled an antisemite. But if you speak calmly, rationally and factually about specific individuals and things they have objectively done and said without making mention of their jewish identity at all, some jews will still pop their heads up and accuse you of antisemitism regardless.

Pointing out that not all jews engage in that equally in every circumstance does not obviate this at all. It still happens like clockwork and the examples of this pile up by the day now.

@snugglefist @alex @ninapaley for instance, they will complain about "late-stage capitalism" being the reason for whatever their gripe happens to be. yet every single fortune 500 company recieves subsidies/contracts/investments from the government. major banks aren't allowed to fail despite the bafflingly irrisponsible behavior from their executives. regulations make it impossible for small businesses to compete with larger ones. individuals need the state's approval when making "private" transactions

you are taxed on everything you earn, then you're taxed again when you spend those earnings. some things you purchased will then be taxed annually. if you die, your wealth and property will then be taxed for a fourth time before making it to whomever you've left it to. on top of this, the state has mandated that you must be insured if you own a vehicle, which is a practical necessity thanks to how infrastructure is designed.

this isn't even touching DIE initiatives or minority-only scholarships. does all of this sound like the free exchange of goods and services, or is it more akin to a socialist nanny state that absorbs wealth from its productive demographics and doles it out to everyone else?