LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

BTW, have you noticed, that people jumped on the bait of including political framing in definitions?

Let me ilustrate:
Incel:
A member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile towards women and men who are sexually active.

Think for a moment. Is that an actual definition? No, it isn't. The first part of it is definition, because definition has to desctibe some objective reality.

So: >>A member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually<<

This is a fine definition. I don't think it's perfect, but it's servicable.

But, people have since started including the word "typically" into it. And that's ridiculous. If I say, that cars have typically a black color, that doesn't mean that cars can't be yellow. In fact, the color does have literally nothing to do with the definition of a car. So, while there are hundreds of things typical of a car, literally not a single one of them should be ever included in a definition.

So, why is it in this definition? Because it's literally there only to influence your opinion on the topic. Since writing (>>the jews want you to hate this group<<) would be too on the nose, they just smear them with the most inflamatory claim that still does seem at least believabvle, and hope people will be too dumb to notice.

And, people are indeed too retarded to notice.

I just wanted to check on the incel discourse, and I have to say, that women have to be getting dumber every year. I know they were dumb, but this is next level.

> Every woman should be married by the age of 20. That's dumb. How would that help this guy?

Yes, a feminist asked ON VIDEO that she edited, how would life of an average incel improve if women were forced to marry.

I am not saying, that I agree with that particular solution, but how stupid do you have to be to not see the connection between "all women are married", and "there is a higher chance of a guy getting a gf"?

But more importantly, he refuses to think about the strategy. It's weird to be talking about it for 90 minutes, and yet he didn't mention the entire anti-white push that is powering the resentment more then anything.

> But if we show, that Trump earned more money
> His corrurion is next level...

No amount of corruption is a worthy trade for extinction. That should not be a hard concept even for Destiny.

Was listening to Destiny today.
That idiot spent the entire 95 minutes talking about strategy, and literally nothing abiut the arguments themselves.

And then, he wonders why noone takes his "arguments" seriously.