Why is it that people who are thying to prove something are always the people who are unable to choose a sane argument.
Ok, you want to argue the existence of god.. Ok
Good arguments: Relatively working carmic systems, The fact that evolution is working, whe fact that the earth is in a relatively sustainably safe place in the universe, ridiculously unlikely phenomena like "the moon is the exactly same scale on sky as the sun."
An actual arguments I have heard: "I am proof god exists. My life is a miracle" (definitelly not psychopatic)
Look at this tree. (yeah... it's a tree)
I have heard a similar arguments for everyhing from feminism, veganism and even political systems, but whenever I heard an argument that was just perfect, it was never from someone that cared about the argument at all.
@dielan @Ricotta @igeljaeger @lain @rin @roka
Remember that the logo for the fediverse is a fully connected graph, not a set of nodes are disconnected.
Perhaps someone more educated in the history of the evolution of gnu/social and its successors can explain in more detail how we came from the idea of federated instances to the current situation of atomized instances federated in name only.
Imagine if you couldnât send email from a gmail to a yahoo, or from comcast to someone in russia, do you think just maybe it would have faced difficulties with adoption?
In addition there are ethical arguments which I outlined previously and i stand behind them. All blocks should be fully disclosed, to not do so is unethical.
â¦fuck I canât sleepâ¦
>>>Satire account<<<
Fascism:
When you don't let people abuse your kids.
LukeAlmighty DO NOT have any pronouns. You can only refer to LukeAlmighty by LukeAlmighty's name. Please, be tolerant of this.
Please be patient, LukeAlmighty have autism
🇨🇿
I you are in Czech republic, DM me, I'll be happy to grab a beer with you
>>>Satire account<<<