Fragment from Romania's constitution.
Art. 30 - Freedom of expression
(1) The freedom to express thoughts, opinions or beliefs and the freedom of creation of any kind, orally, in writing, through images, through sounds or through other means of communication in public, are inviolable.
(2) Censorship of any kind is prohibited.
(3) Freedom of the press also implies the freedom to set up publications.
(4) No publication may be suppressed.
(5) The law may impose on the mass media the obligation to make public the source of financing.
(6) Freedom of expression may not prejudice the dignity, honor, private life of the person or the right to one's own image.
(7) Defamation of the country and the nation, incitement to war of aggression, national, racial, class or religious hatred, incitement to discrimination, territorial separatism or public violence, as well as obscene manifestations, contrary to good morals, are prohibited by law. .
(8) The civil responsibility for the information or for the creation brought to public knowledge rests with the publisher or director, the author, the organizer of the artistic event, the owner of the means of multiplication, of the radio or television station, in accordance with the law. Press offenses are established by law.
Source: https://www.constitutia.ro
You can easily use google translate if you're curious, it's very accurate.
re: Fragment from Romania's constitution.
re: Fragment from Romania's constitution.
@waltercool
It's a mix of good and bad. Recently a bill was also approved that punishes people for basically hate speech against gypsies. But at the same time, communist parties are illegal.
@ChristiJunior @waltercool
I think gypsies are over 10% of the country, so you'd lock up only about 85% probably.
@ChristiJunior @waltercool
Looking up the numbers now... apparently gypsies are 3%... I wonder why I had that 10% number in my head then...
@ChristiJunior @waltercool
I wouldn't guarantee the siblings part, but from my experience growing up, there were definitely a lot of kids during school/uni that you could say were more brown, but from their behavior, how they talked, dressed etc. you wouldn't be able to think they were anything other than Romanian.
@ChristiJunior @waltercool
Thing is, PSD didn't really give a crap about the referendum either. What happened was, that a religious non-profit, gathered signatures from the population to change the constitution to oppose gay marriage. And if someone gathers enough of them, they can force the government to hold an official referendum (it's in the constitution I believe). PSD happened to be in power at that time, but they didn't promote the referendum that much. I suspect they might have actually opposed the initiative, but at the same time didn't have the guts to do it openly, as to maintain their image.
As for Nicoliță, he was loved by the entire country. He was a good football player, and always gave it his all. It was of course widely known he was gypsy, but no one cared one bit as far as I can tell. Not sure if he's still playing. I don't follow sports much.
@waltercool @ChristiJunior
The thing with Romani is that they are culturally a migratory people. Meaning their traditional cultural values are not about integrating with the lands they pass through. They basically isolate themselves within their communities. Which leads to the type of integration problems the West is seeing now with Muslims that came in recently.
While I wouldn't call this culture of theirs wrong per say, it is indeed incompatible with the culture of the lands Romani currently live in.