Show newer

@icedquinn @critical @galena
If the make-up companies are all Jewish (whatever that would mean) I guess so... There is indeed quite a bit of pressure to maintain male circumcision practices in USA and doctors can sometimes be quite forceful in getting the parents' consent for the procedure.
Don't know how high the thing goes though. You should probably ask people in the MRA community.

@critical @icedquinn @galena
They rely a lot on foreskins, but I'm pretty sure they also use fetus tissue.

@icedquinn @galena
Abortion is murder or something... i don't know. I can't even right now.

@galena
My issue is when people make REALLY bad arguments and think they're argument is golden. I try to ease them into realizing there are flaws in them, so maybe then can improve them and maybe actually make them air-tight. I didn't seem to have any luck with that today.

I'm pretty sure I didn't respond to any of your posts. And yet you're still here.

@emilis
I've found Windows does it eventually, when it feels like it. I think it has some time of day when it tries to do it, instead of on boot.

>but language is imprecise, you can't have precise definitions!
Maybe you can't. And if you can't be precise enough with the most critical terms in a discussion, then you no place taking part in that argument.

>just leave the discussion if you don't want to argue the way I want you to argue
Tried that. You fuckers are stalking my timeline already :blobshrug:

@galena
The chad version is the one I personally HATE. The shit in my colon is an uninvited intruder into my body. Should we start advocating for shit abortions?

Personally I'm not a big fan of the chad version either, and I believe that in an ideal utopic society, there would be no abortion at all. But we don't live in an ideal society, and the "virgin" abortion argument is the only one so far I accept.

How many times should I repeat this? You can't give an argument, especially not one that your "opposition" would consider coherent, until you make sure both parties in the discussion start from the same premise (which includes the same definitions of words). Otherwise, of course people won't be able to follow along, and they'll just call your argument incoherent.

Fun fact for the few morons that exist on the internet: even when a person is declared dead, after how ever many hours of failed resuscitation attempts you want, most of the cells in that human body are in fact still alive. It's why organ transplants work. But we still call the person DEAD.

@Tepid_Tapir @critical @NEETzsche @Eris @Samhydeigger
>Firstly source, because what I consider dead is most certainly very dead
We're doing "very dead" now? Ok, I'm done. When even the definition of "dead" is apparently not clear, you know you've reached peak "impossible to discuss" territory.
I'm not even reading the rest of it. I'm too tired at this point...

"Very dead"... jesus fuck dude...

@icedquinn @critical @NEETzsche @Eris @Samhydeigger @Tepid_Tapir
God bless gingers! Each and every one of them is a wonderful being we must treasure the the fullest.

@critical @NEETzsche @Eris @Samhydeigger @Tepid_Tapir
I knew this wasn't gonna be civilized from his opening post. Not that pro-life/anti-abortion people can't be civilized and discuss in a civilized manner, it's just that I've noticed Eris around, and the topic is what it is.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.