applejack @applejack@gameliberty.club
Joined Apr 2021
@Spaghettimon @Mysha @prouddegenerate As an ideology it's a hyper complicated and mystified, just completely made up, framework of ying yang style forces (dialectics) that you then shove things into
It's that kike trait of mystifying and pilpuling reality into rabbinical batshit so you can say anything is anything by layers and layers of abstraction
It sometimes is even literally mystical, with weird (and completely wrong) theories about human evolution, matter and consciousness, and a fuckton of other shit
As an end goal it's a society where everyone is equal (somehow), nobody is forced to do anything (somehow), there is no hierarchy and it doesn't develop (somehow), everyone shares equally (for some reason), and crime doesn't exist because in the dual ying yang shenanigans communists actually think crime only exists from friction with class conflict
@picandor The "equality" meme has always been "people are not allowed to dislike me for being a weird pervert", what exactly would you expect?
@Spaghettimon @Mysha @prouddegenerate They are and so are the Reps. They're equally in love with sodomy and niggers, that's what defines leftism
Doesn't change anything if one gets payed by Adelson and the other by Bloomberg, it's kike finklethink regardless
@Spaghettimon @Mysha @prouddegenerate Tell me who those billionaires are and why they do it. You won't, because they're the ones that made and propagate your tool of an ideology too
That's why you support every single bourgeoisie social policy that corps, governments, the UN, the EU, every celebrity, all of them, fucking support. You literally have mainstream communist celebrities, kike schools with hebrew emblems pushing it, because it's not a threat to them
You're a retarded tool. Fucking shut up about "refuse to follow the system", you're part of it
@sunrise That's basically right though. I remember Linus making the exact same point (without the politics) at some Debian convention
@Terry Everything has an equal and opposite reaction
@HyperboreanWave
>704 likes
>1.114.815 views
>5000 comments
>Comments like this have more likes
Kikes really can't run from numbers no matter what they do
@tengumatingpress @gigaracist @DK_Dharmaraj Okay, this is actually good info, didn't know it was kinda intermittent and then increased
@tengumatingpress @gigaracist @DK_Dharmaraj
Menstruation is part of ovulation. If this is an actual thing, I'd like a link to it
>The ovulation and menstruation cycle typically begins when a woman is between 8 and 15 years old.
https://iapmd.org/the-cycle
@basadeskaiser @gigaracist @DK_Dharmaraj @tengumatingpress Modern estimates on this mainly look at drug addict niggers as their sample and then don't account for it. This is strong and consistent across different measures
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219236/
>Among whites, in contrast, first born children of mothers 20 to 25 scored lower on the average than children of mothers 18 to 19; children of mothers under 18 did not differ from the other groups.
>The evidence is consistent that perinatal problems increase among mothers above age 30; however, recent evidence from the Danish Perinatal Study and from the Collaborative Perinatal Project in the U.S. show a linear relationship between maternal age and perinatal mortality with low rates among young women, and increasing rates with maternal age (Mednick and Baker, 1980)—or that there is no relationship (Broman, 1981), at least for ages 12–29.
>In general, the results from the three data sets were very similar. The authors' (Belmont et al.) conclusion was that the offspring of teen mothers suffer IQ depression only because of associated social disadvantages and not because of any “immaturity of the mother.”
>Although these relationships appear to hold in the population as a whole, there appears to be little difference between children of adolescent and non-adolescent mothers in special samples where prenatal and postnatal care are good. Sandler et al. (1981) evaluated the relationship between the age of mother and two measures of newborn behavior: 1) the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (Brazelton) and 2) a measure of infant temperament (Carey “My Baby” scale). No differences were found on the Brazelton Scale or Carey scale between children of adolescents and post adolescents (age not defined) within the first few days after birth.
>A number of recent studies failed to find any difference by age of mother in health status of neonates at birth (Apgar score, birth weight, prematurity, birth trauma, etc.) once initial differences such as differences in SES between adolescents and non-adolescents were controlled (Zuckerman et al. 1983; Rothenberg et al., 1981). Net of SES, Broman (1981) found older women to have higher birthweights among blacks, but not whites. Also net of SES, Broman (1981) found the youngest adolescents (12–15) to have lower Apgar scores than older adolescents among whites and blacks. The differences were very small, however.
The youngest birth mother was 5 when she gave birth to a healthy baby boy in 1940s Peru
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Medina
Like fuck a 12yo can't today
@tengumatingpress @gigaracist @DK_Dharmaraj Menarche means they're fertile regardless
Menarche is delayed if there isn't enough food though, so it's been known to only happen at like 16-17. Is that what you're thinking of?
@tengumatingpress @gigaracist @DK_Dharmaraj It's a bit of both, but what do you mean they're not fertile until a few years after menarche?
@gigaracist @DK_Dharmaraj And the retarded dysgenics of them. The age a woman has kids is a multiplier
It's literally point #1 when it comes to population reduction
And forcing women to spend 6+ years fertile but idle for no reason leads to more promiscuity, obviously
@PoisonDartPepe2 @DK_Dharmaraj It's weird how many right wingers autistically stick to this modern liberal value and treat it so moralistically
You're just not allowed to discuss it
@galena This is only the case because as things are regulation is only ever made for them
You can make laws that apply to big corps but not small ones, obviously, they just don't
What do you do against big corps when you're not allowed to regulate or kill their executives when they're, for example, influencing culture so people become in favour of big governments (who then get payed off by big corps)?
Joined Apr 2021
