@miria A marriage is a contract. Should you not enforce contracts?
@matrix There is no state where this isn't retarded. If good people give up power that means bad people get more power
I guess if you really really really believe in some "process" like democracy, okay, but that's dumb too
@beardalaxy @miria @matrix @LouisConde The code's obfuscated, but it's just stringing together b64 buffers
it fetches
https://api.ipgeolocation.io/ipgeo?apiKey=ae511e1627824a968aaaa758a5309154
takes it into JSON, then looks at if res.country_name.is "russia" or "belarus"
then if that's true it calls the h() function for each of "./" "../" "../../" "/" and then calls itself recursively on any other files and overwrites them with "❤"
Guessing it does it in that order to maximise impact before someone notices
@Elfie Just, reply, retweet reply. Same result
@LouisConde SJÓNRÆNT
@matrix @LukeAlmighty @matana A version of something makes a more extreme version of that thing easier. It's just literally obviously true, don't even need to show evidence for the steps. How can people imagine it's not
They didn't even name it right. Gambler's fallacy is named because gamblers do a fallacy, but things actually go down and accelerate in a slope, it's retarded
@bajax @Coyote @Eris @maxmustermann @blackeyes Maths equations working doesn't mean the story they attach to it is accurate
There are 100% valid mathematical models that explain 100% of observed astrology, where the Earth is at the centre, they're just more complex
I know there are classical mechanical explanations for the double-slit experiment for example, and probably a lot of other stuff, but it's way to complex to get the details off unless you're retarded autistic smart
Some of it isn't even valid regardless anyway. Phenomena that change when you try and measure them are called "undisprovable" which means they're inherently not science, they're not disprovable, so the scientific method literally just doesn't apply to them, or something like calling it "random". Why's it random? Because we can't predict it? Where does the randomness come from? How the hell does that work? It's just dumb to make that assumption tbh
@Spag @mactonite Same graph but with the US, and then same graph but with comparable countries. It was a comparative power house because it was just massive, which came from first stealing from the Tsars and then colonising other countries, but it was actually shitty at growing, though granted it had a relative boom from just raw industrialisation efforts that then lagged
Also, >gdp
Commies will always be as greedy and money oriented as capitalists
Third thing, these are numbers, and IIRC it's measured in in USD, which has tricky comparisons to soviet rubles, and the actual numbers from the state have to be trusted anyway, without really any outside audits
Fourth, the graph is literally showing that it rebounded faster than it was growing previously, lol
@takao @roboneko@bae.st @roboneko@freespeechextremist.com @Zerglingman @lelouchebag No, okay, libjxl ships with one, so I'll just need to restart the FM. Epic
@takao @roboneko@bae.st @roboneko@freespeechextremist.com @Zerglingman @lelouchebag installed libjxl and imagemagic likes it now
Weebit of niggering and I can open them regularly now. I guess writing a thumbnailer entry would be easy too
@takao @roboneko@bae.st @roboneko@freespeechextremist.com @Zerglingman @lelouchebag >A modern image format optimized for web environments. JPEG XL generally has better compression than WebP, JPEG, PNG and GIF and is designed to supersede them. JPEG XL competes with AVIF which has similar compression quality but fewer features overall.
Sounds good. If it gets support I'll probably use it then
@ninja8tyu It's fake. Stop falling for jpegs
@roboneko@bae.st @roboneko@freespeechextremist.com @Zerglingman @lelouchebag @takao I have no idea, I've never heard of it, but nothing supports it as is anyway so I have little reason to use it
Tbf, there isn't much effort. Mainly stuff will (and generally should) use something like imlib that already supports webp and jpeg with a simple interface, but more low level stuff like browsers sometimes implement it using the reference libs
@roboneko@bae.st @roboneko@freespeechextremist.com @Zerglingman @lelouchebag @takao
>software question not a format one
Only in abstract. The actual libs are what's used, not specs. I've used libjpeg and it's not fun, and I'll imagine whatever implements jxl is probably less so
I feel like you're in a weird all or nothing mindset. I'll accept there are places where it's not the best but I was responding to people saying it sucked inherently
>without good reason
30-40% lossless reduction with an open standard that's easy to implement with a cross-platform FOSS library
Anything that uses images implements multiple formats already, generally much less useful ones too. There just literally is no downside in not supporting it, and again, it's not all or nothing, you're thinking too abstractly
There's not a single program on my computer that supports jxl and none of those I've ever needed. You can have different priorities, that's fine, but I'll take lossless 40% reduction over 2^31 images and tiling that work with almost nothing. I don't really want to use lossy encodings to begin with, quality is more important to me than storage or bandwidth
@bitcoinmagazine
>walk up to stand
>buy a few tomato for $3 bitcoin
>stand there for 10+ minutes while the transaction goes through
>transaction cost is $5
Amazing