Show newer
It's because leftists make up so many lies to support their worldview that there really is no difference between reality and fiction to them effectively. Reality is reformatted to fit their desire. Truth is considered to be relative. Facts are made up by bad faith institutions and individuals. Logic is overruled by feelings.
Communists are retarded faggots.
I learned more about this story today, and it's even funnier.

The story everyone is told today is that a Jewish woman, Rosalind Franklin, took the first picture of DNA via x-ray crystallography. The gist of the problem is that things like DNA are too small to photograph, but if the structure is "crystalline", you can infer its structure indirectly through diffraction.

Rosalind Franklin took these images, but they were "stolen" from her by Watson and Crick before she had a chance to study them, who then took credit for her discovery. This story is everywhere, and has been used to, basically, rewrite the story of DNA's discovery. Any text book on the subject of x-ray diffraction has a section on this, it's pretty much the "pbuh" of optics.

But what really happened is that her grad student, Raymond Gosling (almost literally me!), took the photos. She thought they showed that there wasn't a helix structure, and so abandoned the research (and in fact, held a mock funeral for the helix model of DNA soon after).

Raymond Gosling and Maurice Wilkins (Gosling's original graduate advisor and named mockingly in the "obituary") disagreed with Franklin. Gosling gave the photos to Wilkins, who then passed them to Watson and Crick, who correctly recognized it's structure, and advanced the research further. Ultimately the three of them were given the Nobel prize for their research.

The actual issue is that they never got permission from Franklin to use her photos. At the same time, she didn't recognize what they showed, so much so that her own grad student decided to go rogue and smuggle them to other scientists.

RT: https://poa.st/objects/e19cb074-a017-4a62-9898-7778c22be494
@s2208 @ree of course this won't apply to mudslimes and niggers since the laws never applied to them to begin with

@coded_artist
Actually, switching the software generation makes a perfect sense, but you have to also understand, that the issue is not with the students, but with teachers. People get out of the school, where teachers know the "industry standart", but they are placed to a room with blender. They will be useless for a few years. Or, god forbid, they expected 2d drawing, only to be placed in front of Blender.

But, after a decade or two, even a boomer can notice the change and learn to use the new tools, so now new hires know what they will be working with again.

Just a thought:

In the early 2000's, in Metropolis (2001) movie, Planetes (2003) series, and others, anime was able to incorporate 3D into 2D scenes smoothly.

Then, for no apparent reason, came over a decade of choppy 3D animation, from Kemono Friends to Berserk remake, Dorohedoro, etc...

Finally, this decade, Demon Slayer (2024) comes out with smooth 3D animation again.
(Not recommended BTW, the animation is good, but the story is mediocre)

What the hell happened in the 2010's?

Mauling it over with a friend, the best I could find was Blender.
3D software was either not as good, or too expensive, and there was a generation of animators who didn't know how to use it well as a result, at least in the anime industry.
Then Blender rose to prominence around 2019.

As good a reason as any, but I'm not 100% convinced.

i love sh2 and haven't played max payne (yet) but this is hilarious

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.