matrix07012 @matrix@gameliberty.club

I got sick at the second worst time possible. I'm not graduating this year gg

@Aldo2
>Definition of implicit bias admitting you can't prove it, just trust us bro

I expected nothing better from Reddit.
The quality of schools is largely selection. A school is good because good students attend it. It's why private schools are so good because they can be very selective who goes there.

Ironically, schools that could select out the problematic black kids would help individual black people more than things like Obama era restrictions on black kids.

The definition of systemic racism is just the equity fallacy, unequal results = racism.

Result we don't like is totally racism, but explicit policy that discriminates against a race of people is actually anti-racism.

>"China and Bumfuckistan aren't right either, but they don't give a fuck that they aren't"
The American empire is right more often than the thirdworld tyrants, partially because it does understand that might isn't right

>Austrian schoolers gonna Austrian school...
yes

@Wiz

@Wiz check their account

UK isn't making it

They're fucking retarded

@LukeAlmighty

@Aldo2
>opportunist first and foremost
Trump, but in the same way I can just dismiss your Salon article.

>It is not self-hate
It often is. Or empathy one should have for children misplaced towards "oppressed" people. There is no pragmatic reason for subsidizing an unproductive group (ever growing if you consider the entire world), while also opposing ways of filtering out the productive ones.

>So because someone is engaging in racially motivated crime, you're blaming White liberals?
I'm not the best at expressing myself, but there's no way you can reasonably interpret my reply like that

>They play one group against the other all the time!
You're saying it like that makes it better

>this is sociology 1-0-1.
I know, you can't say that after claiming DEI is pragmatic.

>in your mind, Trumpian nepotism is better than DEI
From the start I've said it's same or worse depending on the angle.

>You think Trumpian nepotism is "neutral"
It's racially neutral. The criteria is "How many yes'es you can say", not "Are you non white"

>So you're saying a "pro-White" presidency is naturally not meritocratic in any way?
Explicitly pro-white implies racism so yes.

>Also, being "pro-White" is also an ideology, just like being pro-DEI
yes, that's why it's bad.
But being against anti-white racism isn't being pro-white

>The whole argument for being "pro-White" was a "return to meritocracy". Hundreds of articles were written about this.
No? The racial identarians don't want a meritocracy, because it doesn't benefit whites 100%.

>Import turd world ideas, become the turd world, no?
Guarding against thirdworldism isn't importing thirdworld ideas.

Many of the failures of capitalism (like expensive housing) are actually just a consequence of government policy. Or don't event matter (like inequality).