Show newer

@LukeAlmighty I feel that most of the time this argument is made by lazy people trying to avoid responsibilities, but there are circumstances under which it's valid imo, mainly under some monopoly where your rights aren't technically violated, but there's only one available employer and it's not feasible to start your own business so your choice of association is limited.

Or with an example of speech, when majority of communication is done on the internet, but nobody wants to provide you service to host your legal site, none of your rights were violated, but your ability to say things gets in effect limited.

It seems like a lot of the dubbing problem is basically fucking idiots that thinks that the English dub having its own interpretation of the character is valid. It's not a fucking play, it's supposed to be a translation of the original work and beholden to the original work they must be
"palworld is derivative of pokemon and you shouldn't play it, also here's a Persona clone but with worse art and black people in it you should buy it"
Cant believe Palworld has already sold 18 billion copies in its first few days of the preview, completely dominating the game industry and causing nintendo to shut its doors until they can find a way to make up for their staggering losses in pokemon sales

@largess What is the difference between a Man and a Parasite? A Man builds. A Parasite asks, "Where is my share?"

if i could customize my character in palworld to be andy or leyley, then butcher a human i capture and eat it

i'd buy the game instantly
Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.