Show newer

For supporting ? I think?

I've had run-ins with the Fake Avengers before, but I guess they forgot to block my main, too!

You got a cute wife, that way I don't like

Violence, death, explicit language 

@vice@newsbots.eu I'm shocked this isn't more viral

@obi

The issue is jsut that "he is not a scientist" was never meant to say "you should only listen to scientists"... it was intended, as newark said, to mean "He isnt making precise statement here, it is rhetoric" Where I emphaized saying the infection is "more prevelant than we thought" doesnt mean much in any specific sense because they arent actually comparing it to specific figure .. more prevelant than who thought, higher than what figure?

the point is, what was being said had no value due to its lack of precision. Mentioned a scientist didnt say it wasnt an appeal to authority but rather pointing out that non-scientists are often so impercise with their words as to useless, as was the case here

@namark @realcaseyrollins

As a Christian myself, the fact that these concepts have such traction in my community (this podcast is paid for by the Washington Times) is quite troubling.

Have they learned nothing from how government overreach has been used to encroach on their own freedom??

Show thread
Show older