Show newer

@freemo
To be fair to P, he never said you did call your lawyer, he merely said you were getting ready to do so.
@p @cowanon

@freemo @realcaseyrollins

> I will respond if i have an opinion.

Feel free, but "You just happened to respond to *me*!" is disingenuous for you to say at best.

@freemo
Hmm. That's actually pretty similar to what P said, except he left out the VPN part.
@p @cowanon

:emergency: :fedi_absturztau_be: Instance info :emergency:

we have a problem with mastofe on my instance rn. you are not able to post with it currently. the issue is already reported.

please use pleroma-fe or some third party client until the issue is fixed.

sorry for that. :blobcatshy:

https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/issues/1761
@freemo @cowanon @realcaseyrollins

> In the end he caused little more than noise for me.

You said you were going to call the cops if he tried to sign up for an account on qoto, and later said you were preparing to call your lawyer. Where'd that go?

@p

Its cool, I dont think you mean to come across antagonistic at all. It would not surprise me if what I'm reading is just annoyance.

I will respond if i have an opinion. These are public forums and if im responding to a comment by you it doesnt mean you are expected to respond to me. It is more so me addressing your opinions and sharing my own, for anyone to comment on if they wish.

When your done with a conversation, walk away.

@realcaseyrollins

@cowanon @freemo @realcaseyrollins Ah, he was doing that because Freemo went all Internet Tough Guy and was totally oblivious throughout. Choice quotes were "I own an AR-15, you are welcome to come visit my city" and nearly every post he made containing an accusation of "micropenis".
@freemo @realcaseyrollins

> ever since one of the members from his server started threatening to kill me

No, I got annoyed by the entire 80-post DM tribunal, he deleted the threats and they were a response to you talking about guns and telling him to come to your house. I saw that thread, man. I said what I would do, I did it, I kept getting messages, I kept saying that I was done with the part that required my participation.

> became antagonistic in all our communications ever since.

This is incorrect, and in this thread, I got annoyed rather than "antagonistic". Perhaps you confuse the two, perhaps I don't come across how I think I come across, perhaps our communications styles clash, but I have no interest in dissecting this conversation. If you do, feel free to untag me.

> So my hope is eventually it will die down and he will go back to acting normal

In fact, if you'd like to condescend, feel free to untag me as well.

> eventually the maturity he is otherwise capable of comes back to the surface

I think it is a lack of self-awareness on your part. I ask a question, your reply is obscurantist, I make a joke, your reply misses the joke, I say I'm done and don't care, you reply with a page and a half rebuttal, I reach wits' end.

So, to be clear, I do not give a damn if you think I'm doing it wrong; I'll listen if you care to talk philosophy but if you want to go all "your claim of it 'never' happening is obviously false" and "This all seems rather clueless", you don't need to tag me.
@realcaseyrollins @p @freemo

Well yeah. I'm actually a main character. You can't tell online, but I have blue hair in real life.

@sadladpress

lol, constant threats.. We dont even silence GAB, for the most part we almost never silence and have never threatened to silence anyone.

If anything I have constantly pushed back against enourmous pressure to silence P's instance and many others which I refuse to do.

I have no issue with P in the least.

@p @realcaseyrollins

@p

As @realcaseyrollins said, this conversation is getting painful now. I'm done.

hopefully next time the conversation can be more pleasant. But I do not see a hope to recover from this round.

@freemo @p It just seemed like you two just had a genuine misunderstanding, IDK why y'all had to go and make it so personal for but okay

Show older