Show newer

i love this site you can probably know everyone on it if you wanted

Self-flushing toilets are a symbol of all that is wrong in Western culture. People don't take care of their own shit, so systems are devised to do it for them, which trains them to further not deal with shit, and does it badly and not when needed or wanted.

BREAKING: Today @elonmusk
will launch the US stock market into space

@realcaseyrollins

The bulk of servers do. Its simple the radicalized ones tend to be the loudest so its easy to presume they are the majority.

@design_RG @Sphinx @arteteco

@freemo @design_RG @Sphinx @arteteco Well, that's no fun. I wish differing ideologies were more tolerant and strive harder to coexist

@freemo @design_RG @Sphinx @arteteco

> I have so far avoided posting images that could lead to finger pointing and reputational damage to Qoto in the Fediverse.

Are there that many gun-averse users in the ?

@design_RG @Sphinx @arteteco

I think we need to be careful about enforcing CW as a policy and choosing your own personal limits on when to post CW.

As eugene puts it, CW is mostly a contract between the user and their followers.

People being sensaitive or offended by something shouldnt really be the measure. Our current CW rules around spoilers and nudity is a functional one, it would cause harm to people in a work place setting.

If we start catering to what a person sensative to or offended by something might not like we start down a rather nasty slippery slope in my opinion.. do we CW knives, off color jokes, how about posts criticizing men-s rights movement or feminism (for example snow was greatly offended to see such posts).

On any topic there will always be people who are offended by it, and to the people who have similar views it will hurt our reputation among that group. If we begin trying to accommodate anyone who might be offended by anything we will quickly find we either need to take sides or CW everything.

@4hh3h3h3h33hb2 @commandlinekid @lnxw37a2
For sure, Ethernet is the bomb. I love how the connection is pure, no interference from other signals is possible.

The biggest problem with these studies is that they don't do a good job at demonstrating widespread health threat. The WiFi info provided doesn't seem conclusive, and the 5G source says we shouldn't say it's safe despite the fact that the radiation levels the towers emit are safe and not too dangerous for humans.

Show older