xianc78 @xianc78@gameliberty.club

RPG and adventure games (especially those of Japanese origin, or at least are Japanese inspired) REALLY need to ditch the "collect all the MacGuffins" plots or any variants (destroy/awaken/place the MacGuffin plots) because it turns what would be an otherwise epic story into a scavenger hunt.

The only games I know of that ditch this are the original Phantasy Star games and Chrono Trigger. The first Phantasy Star game in particular does involve hunting down items, but each item on it's own has it's importance instead of just being a number of similar items that needs to be collected, such as weapons that are needed to kill the next boss and all that leads to the final item needed to get to the final dungeon.

Naturally, any JRPG or action-adventure game that does this plot structure would be linear, but if you still want non-linearity, you can just go the WRPG route and have the quests and dungeons be optional tests of skill and experience before defeating the final boss. WRPGs tend to have the whole world open from the onset and the quests and dungeons only exist to leave hints on where to go next. This does handicap the story, but you can make up for it by having backstories and worldbuilding for the characters and setting.

When you see people complain about JRPGs being derivative garbage, this is why. They can all be original if they just drop the "collect the X MacGuffins" plot.

@bronze @AsukaNeko @nugger
>A creature that walks around the house, shitting and destroying everything is infinitely more valuable than someone who defends your property and sells you black market weapons in times of government overreach.

@AsukaNeko @bronze They aren't. Ants are programmed to respond to pheromone signals. You can make an ant pheromone trail that goes in a circle and they will walk laps in said circle until they die from exhaustion.

@bronze Why do people care so much about dogs? Why is it illegal to slaughter and eat them when we can slaughter and eat pigs, who are much more intelligent?

Both vegan and normie animal rights don't make any sense. The most logical stance is to say that natural rights only apply to humans and any other sentient life. All other life is open to slaughter unless they are owned by someone else.

@cjd @dcc @Hoss @prettygood Individualism means that rights apply to individuals rather than collectives. That's it. It does not mean that you can never collectivize/organize. Individuals are okay with this as long as it is voluntary.

How many Native Americans still care about muh colonialism?

New Theory: The normalization about being open about your politics and constantly talking about politics online was a psyop made to help train the pre-crime prediction algorithms that are being created right now.

People's ideological leanings influence how they follow the law and what laws they might break in certain situations. Problem is that talking about politics has been pretty taboo in most certain situations until in recent years. You could gather information based on what news they consume, but a person isn't going to agree with all of the talking points of said news outlet. So the best thing to do is to get celebrities to be more open about their politics on social media and then get everyone else arguing about them. Then, eventually the AI algorithms can determine who is more likely to break a law based on the people who think said law is "unfair". They know that you most likely committed a crime given the arguments you had with people online over the years.