xianc78 @xianc78@gameliberty.club

@ube

Inbox Question: What good is hope in a digital prison?

Inflation is a particularly nasty tax. Most people don't even notice that it's happening. They think that inflation is caused by greedy companies when really it is the direct result of bad monetary policy permanently decreasing the relative value of the currency. It's a tax.

We’ve now published the details of the security issues which we addressed in Monday’s coordinated security release of Matrix: read all about Project Hydra at https://matrix.org/blog/2025/08/project-hydra-improving-state-res/ and please upgrade your servers and rooms where applicable.

Re Meyer, I'm about 80% sure at this point that what he was doing is explained under Quantized Inertia theory. Though I have strong suspicions that he himself did not understand it. If my suspicion is true, then that means what was before a search for a needle in an infinite haystack is now a matter of manipulating some equations that are found in publicly available papers.

Made the mistake of trying to discuss politics on Twitter and now I'm starting to understand why people hate it so much. Never used the block button so much before.

@deprecated_ii @lichelordgodfrey I mean you can't even make your own power infrastructure without government interference...

Larry Fink now co chairs the WEF

https://www.weforum.org/press/2025/08/statement-from-i...

A refresher, if you encounter someone who tries to use the "fire in a crowded theater" doctrine to try to argue away the First Amendment:

The line, often quoted by censorship advocates, is from a 1919 Supreme Court opinion (Schenck v. US) by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. It de facto outlawed trolling.

It was later overturned in a 1969 case (Brandenberg v. Ohio), which severely limited the situations in which speech becomes actionable. It added litmus tests like "imminent", and "likelihood".

The "fire in a crowded theater" argument is not only NOT a law (it came from the judicial branch, not the legislative one), it's not even CASE LAW. It's nothing. A historical note. An error by the Supreme Court that they corrected 50 years later.

The First Amendment is part of the US Constitution. It is the very first change made to the Constitution, once they realized that the government needed to be explicitly constrained from infringing on human natural rights. It is the law of the land. Do not believe a misinformed (or politically biased) authoritarian who thinks a Constitutional amendment can be overruled by a erroneous deprecated court paper.

There are no grassroots protests anymore. With the way things are going, most things will be honey traps:

https://battlepenguin.com/politics/how-large-scale-protest-organizers-can-build-big-tech-surveillance-networks-of-their-participants/

seriously do NOT use archive.org as the only place to archive shit unless you want it to get thrown into a place like this by the usual supects

This is actually awesome. Medical licensure is a massive racket and doctors are shitty drug dealers already so forget about the quality getting worse. What this will really do is give you the freedom to hire a doctor who will play ball with the way you want to be treated, e.g. Ivermectin perscription.