My intention with sharing this is not to make any vaccinated person second guess themselves. My goal is not to worry anyone's conscience. I am sorry if I make that happen to you. My goal is to voice my support of those who are skeptical, as I am. My goal is not division, but unity. (Yes, I have seen the reports of the unvaccinated who died and posted, from the hospital, that they regret not taking the shot. I will assume their honesty. Because the truth is, nobody knows. We have data, including firsthand experience, which can't be completely discounted, and a lot of wishful thinking. And, sadly, law). I'm not saying you are right, nor wrong. I think it should be up to you. (If you think it shouldn't be, why ignore vaccine-related deaths (which are documented, don't ignore the facts for wishful thinking) as collateral? Shots that infants take weren't around for only two years. A lot of them took decades of research. Yes, people died from the disease. But it seems as if COVID is not as deadly as other historical diseases were. But time will tell: this could change). I'm not saying you are right, nor wrong. I think it should be up to you. Which means that I believe it should be up to me as well. Fear and wishful thinking are not hard data. Vaccine-related deaths and a 99% survivability rate are HARD DATA. "SCIENCE", that dogmatic buzzword. I think we should all do what we think is best for ourselves. It doesn't make sense for someone to force you not to take the vaccine if you think it will help you.
With all of that out of the way, and, admitting, that there is a lot of data out there, and it is hard to know who to trust, still yet, we should make informed decisions. Fast food is bad for you. Everyone knows this. This vaccine and covid information is not as set in stone as fast food data. Yet we allow parents to buy their kids fast food. Why, if the argument for a vaccine mandate is all about public health? Why not justify complete totalitarianism in the name of public health? Why not be subjected to the gun and prison for public health? Do you see how this ends? That's where we are heading. Maybe some people would actually like that for themselves. If so, why don't they purposefully break the law NOW and go to prison?
With all of that out of the way, here's, admittedly, just one data point. I'm not going to surf through countless data points. I reject the experimental "vaccine" on principle, for a virus that someone within my age group has a 99% chance of surviving. I shouldn't be able to pass it to you if the vaccines work (which data has shown that they actually don't; you can still get covid even if vaccinated, so what's the scientific point? The word "science" is now a dogmatic term to justify fear (i.e., "climate 'science"). If it isn't scary, it isn't "science"! And "science" is our ultimate barometer of truth! How many "scientists" ignore the truths of God?)
If I die from covid, it's my own fault, my own responsibility, and please, feel free to dance upon my grave in celebration: "Ha! We told you so! We told you so!" I will not care. I won't celebrate someone dying from the vaccine. I don't blame anyone for doing what they think is best. But I expect that same courtesy, even if I turn out to be deadly wrong.
The following is commentary on the posted video.
Virologist says covid "vaccine" weakens your immune system.
Common sense says this "vaccine" is experimental.
Objective data chronicles its adverse effects.
"The humans were the guinea pigs." Amen.
9,000 people have died from the non-vaccine.
Young people are getting inflammation around the heart from the shot.
"What would you say about those who say that this variant exists because of the unvaccinated?" "It's a scariant."
"I don't think we should be subjecting people to a shot in which one of the side effects is death." Duh lol
This virologist says that the "delta variant" is actually the virus weakening. I'm no virologist, and I guess everyone is biased. But why should I be a death statistic for an experimental non-vaccine?
"This isn't influenza. This is not influenza. This isn't the common cold. This is a different family of viruses. And we know our success with other vaccines with other viruses, that's fine. But this one, we have a very horrific track record with coronavirus vaccines in mammal trials, and there's a reason the FDA never let SARS-CoV-1 vaccines come to the market, and never let MERS vaccines come to the market. Every time they saw the signals and they said 'This is too dangerous for humanity.' Well this virus is 80% the same as SARS-CoV-1. Why would they not have that same mindset now? We know how horrifically SARS-CoV-1 and MERS vaccines failed. And now, without long-term safety data, we're pushing forward in an investigational vaccine on a population without knowing those long-term signals."
"If you have already had SARS-CoV-2, you are more immune than the vaccinated." Good thing you can have it and not show any symptoms, huh? Maybe we worry for nothing. "If you have had SARS-CoV-2, you have had a broader immunity than anyone who's gotten a vaccine."
"Pfizer, Moderna, don't contain aborted fetal cells, but they were developed on aborted fetal cells. And they were approved and processed on aborted fetal cells. J&J is grown on aborted fetal cells. And may contain human DNA, as well as human protein, per their application to the FDA. J&J has human fetal DNA and protein in it. Period. Moderna and Pfizer were developed using aborted fetal cells. I think for many of us, that matters."
Let's not forget this virus has over a 99% survivability rate. Politicians execute the wrath of God. (This would include the FDA, police officers, etc. We may be subject to totalitarianism because of sin. Leaders may be well-intentioned, or uninformed, but we are subjected to them because of sin. Maybe one day, we'll gain our freedoms again, and not use them to sin. In Christ's Name I pray, amen). And the wrath of God exists in nature as well. May He have mercy on us. In Christ's Name, amen.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tUE5EBPt-lU&feature=share