Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
My irl friends have sometimes told me that I'm "brave" or show "courage" for speaking my mind almost all of the time, but I interpret that pessimistically.
If I'm considered "brave" or "courageous" by my best friends, with chiseled jawlines, blonde and blue-eyed, 6 ft 4, full Aryan ubermensch phenotype, work in government, have shaken hands with Prime Ministers and Presidents etc... then what does that say about what "bravery" or "courage" is in the modern-day?
"Bravery", "courage", "honor", "honesty"...
Following these virtues is a punishment in of itself regardless of whether it's related to my thoughts about sexuality specifically or just my other everyday thoughts...
I think I should remind (again) everyone from the "Para" community who views, likes and/or shares my content, I was not always this way.
In fact, I was quite a strong "anti", although this became more muted once I started watching loli porn and came to terms with my sexuality and my own life. I still was "in the closet" for a while, and then became a "morality police" sort of guy. Only now do I see how I was still wrong at all those stages.
There are people on F/Pedi and in other places who I attacked in the past, and I want to apologize to them but obviously I don't want to name them (for their safety, not for mine).
Of course, no apology on my part will be enough. I can't turn back time; I can't remove the pain I may have caused.
I guess this is a reason I let some people from these communities follow me but most not, and I rarely if ever follow people back.
The only thing I can say is that I try to be more level-headed now. I try not to be knee-jerk. I try to understand people. I'm trying to rekindle my empathetic side, although I still can get angry and go on the offensive against people (especially those who remind me of my past self).
I'm not asking people to forgive me. I'm just saying that I apologize.
In a strange sort of way, I think I deserve "punishment", but not in a conventional way. This is probably why I just post everything in public. It's just something that I have to do. My "punishment" is to be attacked by people who I would have considered "allies" only a few years ago. My "punishment" is to fight my demons out in the open.
I've come to the conclusion that "Pedos"/"MAP"s do more to promote and protect true freedom than anyone else.
This is why they are despised.
Because they promote actual freedom (of thought, of love, of action) from the repressive system, and not compromise "freedom" within said system.
They remind everyone else that they are shackled to archaic, at best corrupted and at worst completely false moralizing systems of control.
Every time a group (racial, religious, ethnic, sexual etc...) compromises with the system to get its "freedom", it ends up being the "freedom" to live on a reservation, with the population "controlled".
No compromises with this oppressive system! Assimilationism is not the answer, but integration! Assimilation involves cutting out one's own identity, integration involves championing one's identity.
This system deserves to be defeated, in totality.
Then, and only then, can the hand of mercy be extended to the defeated adversaries like Alexander the Great did with the defeated Persians.
ZEUS BE WITH US!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4XfV0vdMAA&ab_channel=BigBOSS
I'm this close to posting the Russian Schoolgirl Bumblebee Twerk video...
I don't get how posting a non-nude video of a girl doing a cartwheel, taken in the U.S. (Utah) is somehow "violating U.S. law" or "violating community guidelines" or "promoting criminality" or......"Spam"...
Months ago I posted pictures of children holding Hezbollah flags with the word "lgf" in the post, and it was taken down for "sexualizing children" (what?). It was then put back up.
Is the "rule" that you can't post any pictures/videos of children ever, never, ever, even if they're non-nude and even if the context in the video/picture is not sexual at all, because SOMEONE MIGHT think "wow, cute/hot"?
Just say it then. Stop giving me these weaksauce excuses and/or deflections.
One of the most ridiculous things I see argued by "right-wing lolicons" is that lolicon ISN'T pedophilia, but toddlercon IS pedophilia.
They argue about art-style, even though the art-style in most cases is the exact same. Heck, many times it's the same artist drawing both (especially regarding Japanese artists).
They argue about "realism", even though once again this is shared by both toddlercon and lolicon and is more-so a lolicon thing to begin with. Artists are getting better, and there's also AI, and 3DCG is a thing, and there's definitely more 3DCG lolicon than there is 3DCG toddlercon.
They say it's because of the age of the subject being drawn, but that also doesn't make any sense considering lolicon is about prepubescent girls 90% of the time.
These arguments just don't hold up to even the slightest scrutiny.
Walking back from the supermarket and there was a little girl practicing cartwheels while wearing short-shorts on the sidewalk...
Bro...
Lecter commented on one of my posts about wanting a study about how MAPs feel and behave, and I found this.
It is a (20 year old now) research paper about how pedophiles/"child-lovers" view themselves.
Although it is limited to only gay Dutch pedophiles/"child-lovers", I think it's a great paper covering the issue.
I screenshotted numerous passages, highlighted specific parts and added my own short comments to some things.
People will say "Mosaddegh was himself a dictator!!!", even though this claim is only partially true at best.
He was elected, and was very popular with the people. He was forced out by the conservative Shah but then reinstated when the Shah realized that he was simply too well-liked.
He was secular, leftwing, even liberal, and not a religious fundamentalist. He was attacked by the Shia fundamentalists (future Khameneists) for being a "Communist" (irony).
He assumed "dictatorial powers" in order to push through his policies that actually favored the Iranian people. This is what led to the coup against him (sponsored by the U.S. and Britain).
This coup brought the repressive dictatorial Sha to power, whose repression led to the 1979 Revolution which led to what we see today.
Every horror that Iran has inflicted upon the Middle East and every horror that has been inflicted upon them could have been prevented if, in the 1950's, democracy was given a chance in Iran.
There is a great point that needs to be made that I haven't seen made by many in the mainstream (for obvious reasons).
Israel and their supporters want "regime change" in Iran, yet the person they hint at wanting is the son of the former absolute dictator monarch, whose security forces (SAVAK) were despised and in the end (it is alleged) simply became the Islamic Republic of Iran's current "secret police".
What difference, if any, will that make?
Where is the "democracy", "women, life, freedom" in that?
The last free and independent Iranian state was led by Mohammad Mosaddegh. He was overthrown because he wanted to nationalize the Iranian energy sector. His overthrow in the end helped to catalyze the 1979 Revolution. This is why the U.S. administration apologized in 2013, because the whole thing "blowback"ed in their face.
This further reinforces the fact that Iranian proxies are better fighters than the Iranians themselves.
And the reason for that is because the Iranians DON'T want to fight, nor do they know HOW to fight. They want others to fight FOR them. This has been the case ever since the Iran-Iraq war.
AoR were/are being used as meat-shields, and even then, Iran can choose (and has chosen) to sacrifice them to the wolves on a whim (as many Hezbollah members/supporters allege).
Iran apparently shot down one of its own drones and then claimed it was a MQ-9 Reaper.
Earlier they said that they had "evidence" of an F35 wreck, but it turned out to be an extremely poor quality AI-generated image.
I don't know which is worse, Iranian state propaganda (PressTV) or Russian state propaganda (RT)...
At least when the Houthis shoot down an MQ-9, they actually show you pics that prove it is an MQ-9.
The only thing that one can criticize Zizek on is his tendency to engage in social-conservatism (which is a very Yugo/Soviet Comm thing to do).
For instance, he equates pedophiles/MAPs with smokers who blow smoke into people's faces.
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
