look loli culture is weird af and you'll never catch me on some sus shit.
that said, lolicons are oppressed. I'd even go as far to say they are the new gamers of our generation 😂

@carlosruzu don't you mean *pedophiles?

Or are you denying that lolicons have pedophilic tendencies?

**Not that I'm siding with the "oppressors" here, I'm just trying to be truthful.

@Aldo2 funnily enough more often that not, its the antis you have to worry about. Usually actual pedos won't actually come clean and honest about them being, well pedos, so they will do anything to downplay their horrififc actions and whatnot.

Not only does this completely contrast the nature of most lolicons, as they tend to be unabashedly for lolis and whatnot, this also describes the loli harpers more often than not. Thus why it checks out whenever the people that harp about lolicons being pedos actually tend to be outed as pedos themselves, kinda like those mfs that harp about lgbtq laws being in the closet

@carlosruzu @Aldo2 What horrific actions?

@miria @Aldo2 is fucking children not an objective evil to life? pedos ofc, if they speak about their mental illness before doing anything, are fine and such but fucking kids is completely unacceptable in any circumstance

@carlosruzu @Aldo2 No

@miria @Aldo2 what instance of having sex with children not objectively bad, may i ask?

@carlosruzu @Aldo2 Consensual ones.

@miria @Aldo2 children can consent????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

@carlosruzu @Aldo2 Yes.

@miria @Aldo2 @beardalaxy ok explain how children, who don't have any conceptualization of sexuality (speaking especially about sub 13 year olds but even anything below 16 is questionable to a very high degree) and don't have a fully formed view of sex can consent to it?

@carlosruzu @miria @beardalaxy

I had a best friend in school who was having sex with his gf from like 13.5/14 years onwards.

They got married, and have two beautiful daughters.

They are a rare, and amazing example of "childhood sweethearts".

They were peers, yes, but that isn't the point.

And I'm not even going to go back into my other friend who was dating a girl a few years younger than him in school and uni.

Your view that people below 16 can't "consent" or understand the nuances of the whole "sex" thing is just, well....Yeah...Not really borne out by reality.

@Aldo2 @miria @beardalaxy the difference is that in that instance it was 2 people around the same age being into each other and finding out shit among each other. To compare to the drinking example, if you and the person you fuck are both drunk, thats not really bad; at worst thats just a bruh moment. The issue with the idea "children can consent" is that you inevitably entertain the idea that Adults, with a more developed and more mature view on sex, can actually get a child to reasonably understand sex on the same level they do. I have nothing really against below 18s fucking each other, especially if they are past like 13 or whatnot, but when i say "kids can't consent" i mean "kids can't consent to adults because kids will have an impaired sense of what sex is"

@carlosruzu @Aldo2 @beardalaxy Why is understanding sex at the same level necessary? And of course kids will have an impaired sense of what sex is, because parents hide it from them, and every time school tries to teach them about it those parents start sperging out.

@miria @beardalaxy @carlosruzu

I think it's because whenever sex education is talked about nowadays, people (on both sides) bring up porn. And that's also indicative of the wider malaise of pornography, in that porn itself warps perceptions about sex.

Obv, porn was not what was used in my sex-ed classes. They were rather boring.

@Aldo2 @beardalaxy @carlosruzu Sex ed classes in the US are shit because if they say something more than "There's something called spermatozoon and something called ovum and when they join a baby is made. Also you should use a condom." then parents start freaking out because supposedly kids shouldn't be learning that.

@miria @beardalaxy @carlosruzu

In a sense, I can see where they're coming from (parents have the right to know everything their children are taught), but also, it's obv an extreme, defensive overreaction.

Not to mention their kids most likely already know about sex before their sex-ed classes even begin, like I did (and in my case it was before the mass-internet and smart phones).